The Journal of urology · 2003
Can bladder outflow obstruction be diagnosed from pressure flow analysis of voiding initiated by involuntary detrusor overactivity?
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Dorkin Trevor J, Leonard Ann S, Pickard Robert S
Аннотация
PURPOSE: We investigated whether a diagnosis of bladder outflow obstruction could be established from pressure flow analysis of a void initiated by involuntary detrusor overactivity.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 79 men with lower urinary tract symptoms were identified prospectively. In each subject 2 sequential pressure flow studies were performed during the same session. Pressure flow data were recorded during a voluntary void and voiding initiated by involuntary detrusor overactivity. Pressure flow parameters were compared using the paired t test and differences in classification according to the International Continence Society nomogram were analyzed using the chi-square test.
RESULTS: The maximum flow rate showed no significant difference between voluntary voiding and voiding initiated by involuntary detrusor overactivity. Detrusor pressure at maximum flow showed a slight, statistically significant but not clinically significant increase during voiding initiated by involuntary detrusor overactivity. However, the diagnostic classification remained unchanged in 64 of 79 men (80%). In no case was the diagnosis altered from bladder outflow obstruction to nonobstruction or vice versa when comparing the 2 pressure flow studies. There were significant increases in maximum detrusor pressure and detrusor pressure at the initiation of voiding during voiding initiated by involuntary detrusor overactivity.
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that increased detrusor pressure observed during voiding subsequent to detrusor overactivity does not change the diagnostic classification in 80% of men. The results provide evidence that bladder outflow obstruction can be reliably diagnosed based on pressure flow parameters recorded during voiding initiated by involuntary detrusor overactivity.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 79 men with lower urinary tract symptoms were identified prospectively. In each subject 2 sequential pressure flow studies were performed during the same session. Pressure flow data were recorded during a voluntary void and voiding initiated by involuntary detrusor overactivity. Pressure flow parameters were compared using the paired t test and differences in classification according to the International Continence Society nomogram were analyzed using the chi-square test.
RESULTS: The maximum flow rate showed no significant difference between voluntary voiding and voiding initiated by involuntary detrusor overactivity. Detrusor pressure at maximum flow showed a slight, statistically significant but not clinically significant increase during voiding initiated by involuntary detrusor overactivity. However, the diagnostic classification remained unchanged in 64 of 79 men (80%). In no case was the diagnosis altered from bladder outflow obstruction to nonobstruction or vice versa when comparing the 2 pressure flow studies. There were significant increases in maximum detrusor pressure and detrusor pressure at the initiation of voiding during voiding initiated by involuntary detrusor overactivity.
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that increased detrusor pressure observed during voiding subsequent to detrusor overactivity does not change the diagnostic classification in 80% of men. The results provide evidence that bladder outflow obstruction can be reliably diagnosed based on pressure flow parameters recorded during voiding initiated by involuntary detrusor overactivity.