Fertility and sterility · 2013
Effect of prior birth and miscarriage frequency on the prevalence of acquired and congenital uterine anomalies in women with recurrent miscarriage: a cross-sectional study.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Jaslow Carolyn R, Kutteh William H
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a prior live birth or an increase in number of miscarriages impacted the prevalence of congenital or acquired uterine anomalies in women with predominantly early recurrent miscarriage (RM).
DESIGN: Single-center, cross-sectional study.
SETTING: Patients with RM at a private practice.
PATIENT(S): Eight hundred seventy-five women who had two or more consecutive miscarriages.
INTERVENTION(S): None.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Frequencies of congenital uterine anomalies (bicornuate, didelphic, septate, t-shaped, and unicornuate uteri) and acquired uterine anomalies (fibroids, polyps, and adhesions).
RESULT(S): A uterine anomaly was identified in 169 (19.3%) of the patients. Patients with primary RM were more likely to have congenital anomalies than patients with secondary RM, particularly septa. The occurrence of a prior live birth, however, did not influence the frequency of acquired uterine anomalies, which were detected in equal frequencies in patients with three or more miscarriages when compared with patients with only two miscarriages.
CONCLUSION(S): Although RM patients with a prior viable birth are less likely to have a uterine anomaly than those who have never given birth, our results support a recommendation for diagnostic imaging of the uterus after two losses in women with secondary RM as well as for those with primary RM.
DESIGN: Single-center, cross-sectional study.
SETTING: Patients with RM at a private practice.
PATIENT(S): Eight hundred seventy-five women who had two or more consecutive miscarriages.
INTERVENTION(S): None.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Frequencies of congenital uterine anomalies (bicornuate, didelphic, septate, t-shaped, and unicornuate uteri) and acquired uterine anomalies (fibroids, polyps, and adhesions).
RESULT(S): A uterine anomaly was identified in 169 (19.3%) of the patients. Patients with primary RM were more likely to have congenital anomalies than patients with secondary RM, particularly septa. The occurrence of a prior live birth, however, did not influence the frequency of acquired uterine anomalies, which were detected in equal frequencies in patients with three or more miscarriages when compared with patients with only two miscarriages.
CONCLUSION(S): Although RM patients with a prior viable birth are less likely to have a uterine anomaly than those who have never given birth, our results support a recommendation for diagnostic imaging of the uterus after two losses in women with secondary RM as well as for those with primary RM.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Abortion, HabitualAdultChi-Square DistributionCross-Sectional StudiesDiagnostic ImagingFemaleHumansLeiomyomaLive BirthMiddle AgedParityPolypsPredictive Value of TestsPregnancyPrevalenceRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsTissue AdhesionsUrogenital AbnormalitiesUterine DiseasesUterine NeoplasmsUterusYoung Adult