Ophthalmic research · 2014
Factors influencing the retrograde labeling of retinal ganglion cells with fluorogold in an animal optic nerve crush model.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Huang Tzu-Lun, Huang Sun-Ping, Chang Chung-Hsing, Lin Kung-Hung, Sheu Min-Muh, Tsai Rong-Kung
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To investigate whether different crush durations or a different fluorogold (FG) injection timing can affect the efficiency of FG retrograde labeling of retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) in the optic nerve (ON) crush model.
METHODS: We performed the ON crush in rats with a clip at different durations or a jewel forceps to compare the effects of different crush methods with FG staining. RGC density was compared between the FG injection 1 week before the sacrifice of the animals (group A) and the injection before the crush experiment (group B). Double staining with CD11b and FG in the retinal sections was conducted to investigate the relationship between the overcounting of RGCs and microglia.
RESULTS: The FG-stained particles were significantly decreased at the distal part of the crush site compared to the proximal site of the ON with a crush duration of over 30 s or when crushed with the jewel forceps. Two weeks after ON crush, the RGC count was higher both in the central and mid-peripheral retinas in group B. The percentage of CD11b-stained cells among the FG-stained cells in the RGC layer of retinas in group B was higher than that of group A (34% in group B vs. 4% in group A, p = 0.0001). Overcounting of RGC density in group B was due to additional microglia with FG engulfing.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that each laboratory should test its setting conditions to avoid factors influencing the RGC density measurement before conducting ON crush experiments.
METHODS: We performed the ON crush in rats with a clip at different durations or a jewel forceps to compare the effects of different crush methods with FG staining. RGC density was compared between the FG injection 1 week before the sacrifice of the animals (group A) and the injection before the crush experiment (group B). Double staining with CD11b and FG in the retinal sections was conducted to investigate the relationship between the overcounting of RGCs and microglia.
RESULTS: The FG-stained particles were significantly decreased at the distal part of the crush site compared to the proximal site of the ON with a crush duration of over 30 s or when crushed with the jewel forceps. Two weeks after ON crush, the RGC count was higher both in the central and mid-peripheral retinas in group B. The percentage of CD11b-stained cells among the FG-stained cells in the RGC layer of retinas in group B was higher than that of group A (34% in group B vs. 4% in group A, p = 0.0001). Overcounting of RGC density in group B was due to additional microglia with FG engulfing.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that each laboratory should test its setting conditions to avoid factors influencing the RGC density measurement before conducting ON crush experiments.