m+Medelevator.RU
← Поиск публикаций
Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions · 2026

Safety and Efficacy of Cerebral Embolic Protection Device During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

СтатьяСистематический обзорМетаанализНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

de Pontes Vinicius Bittar, Jaramillo Sebastian, Trevisan Thierry, Huntermann Ramon, de Sousa Pedro Antônio Machado Gomes, Silva Leonardo Dexheimer da, Clemente Mariana R C, Garot Philippe, Gomes Wilton F

Аннотация

BACKGROUND: Cerebral embolic protection (CEP) devices may mitigate the risk of embolization and stroke during transcatheter aortic-valve implantation (TAVI), yet their safety and efficacy remain debated.

AIMS: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of CEP during TAVI.

METHODS: We conducted a systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library from inception through April 2025 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies comparing TAVI performed with versus without the Sentinel CEP device. Pooled risk ratios (RRs), odds ratios (ORs), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a random-effects model.

RESULTS: Seventeen studies (4 RCTs and 13 observational cohorts) involving 752,164 patients were included; among them, 86,916 (11.5%) received the Sentinel device. CEP use was associated with significantly lower rates of early stroke (within 72 h; RR 0.61; 95% CI 0.40-0.94), any stroke (RR 0.78; 95% CI 0.65-0.94), 30-day stroke (RR 0.47; 95% CI 0.26-0.85), disabling stroke (RR 0.49; 95% CI 0.29-0.84), and all-cause mortality (RR 0.66; 95% CI 0.49-0.89). No significant differences were observed in transient major vascular complications, bleeding events, or acute kidney injury (AKI). In the analysis restricted to RCTs, stroke and mortality outcomes were similar between groups, with no significant differences across safety endpoints. In prespecified subgroup analyses, patients with bicuspid aortic valves derived no significant benefit from CEP (OR O.80; 95% CI 0.40-1.61), whereas those with prior stroke experienced a reduced risk of recurrent stroke (RR 0.61; 95% CI 0.45-0.82).

CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis suggests that the Sentinel CEP device is associated with lower risks of stroke and mortality following TAVI, without increasing the incidence of vascular complications, bleeding, or AKI.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

ИП Урсолов Владлен Сергеевич

ИНН 500118482352 · ОГРНИП 314500117700049

Реквизиты и контакты