World journal of urology · 2026
Salvage therapies for local recurrence of renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Систематический обзорСтатьяМетаанализНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Suleja Agata, Alfarhan Ahmed R, Miszczyk Marcin, Campi Riccardo, Hamdhah Hussain Albin, Amparore Daniele, Francolini Giulio, Roessler Navid, Miyajima Keiichiro, Inoue Shota, Lübbersmeyer Felix, Alhazeem Abdulrahman A, Rajwa Paweł, Bex Axel, Volpe Alessandro, Ost Piet, Shariat Shahrokh F
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: We aimed to systematically summarize data on efficacy of local salvage therapies for local recurrence of renal cell carcinoma (RCC).
METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, CENTRAL, and Google Scholar through 05/08/2026, for studies on local salvage therapies for local recurrence of RCC following radical nephrectomy, partial nephrectomy, or ablation (PROSPERO: CRD42024623099). Meta-analyses were conducted using random-effects models. Risk of bias (RoB) was assessed using ROBINS-I.
RESULTS: Forty-seven studies comprising 2039 patients were included (45 retrospective). Patients recurring after primary ablation predominantly presented with new renal masses, and were managed with repeat ablation (6 studies, n = 193) or salvage surgery (3 studies, n = 48), both yielding low recurrence rates. Local recurrences (M0) after primary partial nephrectomy (PN), most often in patients with pT1 disease, were treated with repeat PN, radical nephrectomy (RN), or ablation (15 studies, n = 562), with heterogeneous outcomes across modalities, ranging from low recurrence rates to predominantly distant metastatic failure. In contrast, recurrences after primary RN (12 studies, n = 564) occurred in a population with primarily locally advanced disease (pT3-4) and outcomes were notably worse, driven by distant progression. Four studies used radiotherapy in salvage setting, with heterogeneous methods and outcomes. Majority of studies were assessed moderate RoB, 16 studies assessed as serious, predominantly due to bias in participant selection.
CONCLUSION: Efficacy of local salvage therapies for RCC recurrence is influenced by the primary treatment and histopathological advancement of primary disease. Repeat ablation provides favorable outcomes, while recurrences after PN can be managed with repeat surgery or ablation, with heterogeneous results (from low recurrence rates to frequent distant metastases). Post-RN patients, often with initially advanced disease, have worse prognosis with approximately two-thirds experiencing progression by three years, primarily due to distant metastases. Overall, quality of evidence remains low. There is critical need for expert consensus on quality indicators for locally recurrent RCC care and for prospective registries with standardized outcome reporting.
METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, CENTRAL, and Google Scholar through 05/08/2026, for studies on local salvage therapies for local recurrence of RCC following radical nephrectomy, partial nephrectomy, or ablation (PROSPERO: CRD42024623099). Meta-analyses were conducted using random-effects models. Risk of bias (RoB) was assessed using ROBINS-I.
RESULTS: Forty-seven studies comprising 2039 patients were included (45 retrospective). Patients recurring after primary ablation predominantly presented with new renal masses, and were managed with repeat ablation (6 studies, n = 193) or salvage surgery (3 studies, n = 48), both yielding low recurrence rates. Local recurrences (M0) after primary partial nephrectomy (PN), most often in patients with pT1 disease, were treated with repeat PN, radical nephrectomy (RN), or ablation (15 studies, n = 562), with heterogeneous outcomes across modalities, ranging from low recurrence rates to predominantly distant metastatic failure. In contrast, recurrences after primary RN (12 studies, n = 564) occurred in a population with primarily locally advanced disease (pT3-4) and outcomes were notably worse, driven by distant progression. Four studies used radiotherapy in salvage setting, with heterogeneous methods and outcomes. Majority of studies were assessed moderate RoB, 16 studies assessed as serious, predominantly due to bias in participant selection.
CONCLUSION: Efficacy of local salvage therapies for RCC recurrence is influenced by the primary treatment and histopathological advancement of primary disease. Repeat ablation provides favorable outcomes, while recurrences after PN can be managed with repeat surgery or ablation, with heterogeneous results (from low recurrence rates to frequent distant metastases). Post-RN patients, often with initially advanced disease, have worse prognosis with approximately two-thirds experiencing progression by three years, primarily due to distant metastases. Overall, quality of evidence remains low. There is critical need for expert consensus on quality indicators for locally recurrent RCC care and for prospective registries with standardized outcome reporting.