Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2008
Bladder injuries during cesarean section in a University Hospital: a 25-year review.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Rahman M S, Gasem Turki, Al Suleiman S A, Al Jama Fathia E, Burshaid Sameera, Rahman Jessica
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: The objective was to determine the prevalence of bladder injury during cesarean section (CS) and identify the risk factors causing these injuries, their management and the outcome.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of all the patients who had bladder injury during CS over a period of 25 years (1983-2007) at the King Fahad Hospital, Al-Khobar, Saudi Arabia. Demographic data, obstetric, surgical details, mechanism of injury, anatomic location, diagnosis, management and outcome were assessed.
RESULTS: Thirty-four cases of bladder injury were identified among 7,708 cesarean deliveries performed during this period with an overall incidence of 0.44%. Primary CS was found in 41.2% of the patients and 58.8% had repeat CS giving an incidence of 0.27 and 0.81%, respectively. Bladder injury occurred when surgical difficulties were encountered during opening of the peritoneal cavity and while developing the bladder flap over the lower uterine segment, mainly due to adhesions and scar tissue resulting from previous abdominal surgery. All the bladder injuries were recognized intraoperatively and repaired with an overall satisfactory outcome. Repeat CS and presence of adhesions were found to be statistically significant risk factors in the study, while operator experience and emergency nature of the CS were considered risk factors in a few cases of bladder injury.
CONCLUSIONS: Data presented in this study indicates that bladder injury when adequately repaired is rarely associated with any complications. Multiple cesarean deliveries is a significant risk factor for bladder injury at the time of repeat CS and patients should be counseled regarding this risk before surgery.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of all the patients who had bladder injury during CS over a period of 25 years (1983-2007) at the King Fahad Hospital, Al-Khobar, Saudi Arabia. Demographic data, obstetric, surgical details, mechanism of injury, anatomic location, diagnosis, management and outcome were assessed.
RESULTS: Thirty-four cases of bladder injury were identified among 7,708 cesarean deliveries performed during this period with an overall incidence of 0.44%. Primary CS was found in 41.2% of the patients and 58.8% had repeat CS giving an incidence of 0.27 and 0.81%, respectively. Bladder injury occurred when surgical difficulties were encountered during opening of the peritoneal cavity and while developing the bladder flap over the lower uterine segment, mainly due to adhesions and scar tissue resulting from previous abdominal surgery. All the bladder injuries were recognized intraoperatively and repaired with an overall satisfactory outcome. Repeat CS and presence of adhesions were found to be statistically significant risk factors in the study, while operator experience and emergency nature of the CS were considered risk factors in a few cases of bladder injury.
CONCLUSIONS: Data presented in this study indicates that bladder injury when adequately repaired is rarely associated with any complications. Multiple cesarean deliveries is a significant risk factor for bladder injury at the time of repeat CS and patients should be counseled regarding this risk before surgery.