The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians · 2017
Death audit in the neonatal ICU of a tertiary care hospital in Bangladesh: a retrospective chart review.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Dey Sanjoy Kumer, Afroze Sharmin, Islam Tariqul, Jahan Ismat, Hassan Shabuj Mohammad Kamrul, Begum Suraiya, Chisti Mohammod Jobayer, Mannan Mohammad Abdul, Shahidullah Mohammod
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Expectant reduction of neonatal mortality and formulation of preventive strategies can only be achieved by analysis of risk factors in a particular setting. This study aimed to document incidence of neonatal death and to analyze the risk factors associated with neonatal death.
METHODS: This retrospective study was carried out in department of Neonatology, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University (BSMMU) over a 12-month period from January to December 2015. The newborns that died within 28 d of life were defined as "Cases" and "Control" were the surviving newborn discharged to home as healthy. Two birth weight and gestational age matched controls were taken for each case. Maternal, obstetric, and newborn characteristics were analyzed between both the groups. Data analysis was performed using SPSS version 20.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). A probability of < .05 was considered statistically significant. The strength of association was determined by calculating odds ratio and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
RESULTS: During the study period, the proportion of death was 9.6% (64/612). Both in Chi-square analysis and in logistic regression analysis, less than four antenatal visits (odds ratio (OR) 2.78; 95% CI: 1.23-6.28, p = .014) and sepsis (OR 2.37; 95% CI: 1.07-5.26, p = .034) were found to be independent risk factors for deaths, whereas LUCS found to be protective for deaths (OR 0.40; 95% CI: 0.19-0.83, p = .015).
CONCLUSION: In conclusion, less than four antenatal visits and presence of sepsis were found to be independent risk factors whereas LUCS protective of newborn death.
METHODS: This retrospective study was carried out in department of Neonatology, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University (BSMMU) over a 12-month period from January to December 2015. The newborns that died within 28 d of life were defined as "Cases" and "Control" were the surviving newborn discharged to home as healthy. Two birth weight and gestational age matched controls were taken for each case. Maternal, obstetric, and newborn characteristics were analyzed between both the groups. Data analysis was performed using SPSS version 20.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). A probability of < .05 was considered statistically significant. The strength of association was determined by calculating odds ratio and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
RESULTS: During the study period, the proportion of death was 9.6% (64/612). Both in Chi-square analysis and in logistic regression analysis, less than four antenatal visits (odds ratio (OR) 2.78; 95% CI: 1.23-6.28, p = .014) and sepsis (OR 2.37; 95% CI: 1.07-5.26, p = .034) were found to be independent risk factors for deaths, whereas LUCS found to be protective for deaths (OR 0.40; 95% CI: 0.19-0.83, p = .015).
CONCLUSION: In conclusion, less than four antenatal visits and presence of sepsis were found to be independent risk factors whereas LUCS protective of newborn death.