MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1177/0018720820913789

Медицинская библиотека · Human factors · 2020

Analysis of Human-Exoskeleton System Interaction for Ergonomic Design.

Wang Yilin, Qiu Jing, Cheng Hong, Zheng Xiaojuan

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

Lower-limb exoskeleton systems are defined as gait training or walking-assisting devices for spinal cord injury or hemiplegic patients. Crutches, straps, and baffles are designed to protect subjects from falling. However, skin abrasions occur when the interaction forces are too large. In this study, the interaction forces between the human body and an exoskeleton system named the AIDER were measured to confirm whether the design was ergonomic.

BACKGROUND

The AIDER system is a wearable lower-limb exoskeleton. It secures a subject by binding on the waist, thighs, shanks, and feet.

METHOD: Eight healthy subjects participated in the study. The interaction forces of the waist strap, thigh baffles, shank baffles, and crutch handles were measured by pressure sensors. Ten repetitions were completed in this study. After one repetition, custom comfort questionnaires were completed by the subjects.

RESULTS

Although a few of the peak values of the maximum intensities of pressure between the hands and crutch handles reached the minimum value of the pain-pressure threshold (PPT), the average pressure intensities were much smaller than the PPT value.

CONCLUSIONS

The results indicated that the mechanical structure and control strategy of the AIDER must be improved to be more ergonomic in the future.

Для цитирования: Wang Yilin, Qiu Jing, Cheng Hong, Zheng Xiaojuan. Analysis of Human-Exoskeleton System Interaction for Ergonomic Design.. Human factors. 2020. DOI: 10.1177/0018720820913789.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.