Gynecologie, obstetrique & fertilite · 2007
[Surgical treatment of stress urinary incontinence by suburethral transobturator tape].
Аннотация на английскомСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Melki E, Monnier B, Richard S, Hocké C
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Assessment of the suburethral transobturator tape in the treatment of female urinary stress incontinence.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective evaluation of 39 slings. Three patients (7%) were lost to follow-up. Analysis was carried on 19 out/in procedures (mainly ObTape and Uratape slings) and 17 in/out procedures (TVT-O slings). Nine patients (25%) had a history of previous stress incontinence surgery. In 21 cases (58%) there was a concomitant surgical procedure, including genital prolapse repair (12) and total hysterectomy (6). Phone interviews were conducted with the validated questionnaires MHU and Ditrovie short form.
RESULTS: The mean operative time was 17 minutes (10-30). Three vaginal wounds (8%) were immediately repaired. Two urinary retentions (5%) were managed by suprapubic catheterization for more than 10 days. With a mean follow-up of 12 months (4-23) the subjective effectiveness on stress incontinence was 89% (cure: 58%; improvement: 31%). Urge incontinence symptoms were cured in 47% of mixed incontinences. Two patients reported an important dysuria. Two sling exposures occurred. Quality of life scores were significantly improved (mean 1,7 versus 3,2, p=0,002). The level of satisfaction reached 89% (very satisfied: 50%; satisfied: 39%).
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: This technique is safe and effective. Our results are nevertheless inferior to those previously reported. Prospective randomised studies comparing the two surgical routes are required.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective evaluation of 39 slings. Three patients (7%) were lost to follow-up. Analysis was carried on 19 out/in procedures (mainly ObTape and Uratape slings) and 17 in/out procedures (TVT-O slings). Nine patients (25%) had a history of previous stress incontinence surgery. In 21 cases (58%) there was a concomitant surgical procedure, including genital prolapse repair (12) and total hysterectomy (6). Phone interviews were conducted with the validated questionnaires MHU and Ditrovie short form.
RESULTS: The mean operative time was 17 minutes (10-30). Three vaginal wounds (8%) were immediately repaired. Two urinary retentions (5%) were managed by suprapubic catheterization for more than 10 days. With a mean follow-up of 12 months (4-23) the subjective effectiveness on stress incontinence was 89% (cure: 58%; improvement: 31%). Urge incontinence symptoms were cured in 47% of mixed incontinences. Two patients reported an important dysuria. Two sling exposures occurred. Quality of life scores were significantly improved (mean 1,7 versus 3,2, p=0,002). The level of satisfaction reached 89% (very satisfied: 50%; satisfied: 39%).
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: This technique is safe and effective. Our results are nevertheless inferior to those previously reported. Prospective randomised studies comparing the two surgical routes are required.