MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.beproc.2023.104890

Медицинская библиотека · Behavioural processes · 2023

Learning and laterality in wild-caught Namaqua rock mice (Micaelamys namaquensis).

Oosthuizen Tasha, Lutermann Heike

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Individuals often exhibit differences in cognition and/or preferences for one side over the other. Such differences have been attributed to the mating system and lateralization of the brain hemispheres that can differ between the sexes, respectively. Despite the hypothesized significant effects on fitness, only a limited number of rodent studies addresses sex differences in laterality and most focus on laboratory rodents. Here we examined whether wild-caught Namaqua rock mice (Micaelamys namaquensis), a rodent widespread in sub-Saharan Africa, exhibit sex differences in learning and laterality in a T-maze. Food-deprived animals entered the maze significantly faster over subsequent learning trials, suggesting that the sexes learned to find the food reward at the end of the maze arms equally. Although we could not confirm a side preference at the population level, the animals were strongly lateralized at an individual level. When the sexes were considered separately, females exhibited a preference for the right maze arm while the opposite was observed in males. The lack of comparable studies of sex-specific lateralization patterns in rodents makes the generalization of our results challenging and highlights the need for more such studies in rodents at both the individual and population levels.

Для цитирования: Oosthuizen Tasha, Lutermann Heike. Learning and laterality in wild-caught Namaqua rock mice (Micaelamys namaquensis).. Behavioural processes. 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2023.104890.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.