MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.2500/ajra.2016.30.4397

Медицинская библиотека · American journal of rhinology & allergy · 2017

Intranasal corticosteroids compared with oral antihistamines in allergic rhinitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Juel-Berg Nanna, Darling Peter, Bolvig Julie, Foss-Skiftesvik Majken H, Halken Susanne, Winther Lone, Hansen Kirsten Skamstrup, Askjaer Nikolaj, Heegaard Steffen, Madsen Anders R, Opstrup Morten S

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяМетаанализСистематический обзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Intranasal corticosteroids (INS) (corticosteroid nasal sprays) and oral antihistamines (OA) are two of the most common treatments for patients with allergic rhinitis (AR). To our knowledge, there are no systematic reviews on this topic including trials published after 2007.

OBJECTIVE

To compare INS with nonsedating OAs as treatments for AR.

METHODS

The systematic review and meta-analysis were based on the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation principles and the Patient, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcome approach. Primary literature was searched up to January 22, 2015. Criteria for eligibility were randomized controlled trials that compared the efficacy and/or adverse effects of INS and OA in patients with AR. Continuous outcome data were analyzed by using standardized mean differences (SMD) for multiple outcome measures, and mean differences in the case of a single study or outcome. Pooled estimates of effects, 95% confidence interval (CI), were calculated by using random-effects models.

RESULTS

The meta-analysis included five randomized controlled trials with a total of 990 patients. INS were superior to OAs in improving total nasal symptoms score (SMD -0.70 [95% CI, -0.93 to -0.47]) and in relieving the following: nasal obstruction (SMD -0.56 [95% CI, -0.82 to -0.29]), rhinorrhea (SMD -0.47 [95% CI, -1.00 to 0.05]), nasal itching (SMD -0.42 [95% CI, -0.65 to -0.18]), sneezing (SMD -0.52 [95% CI, -0.73 to -0.32]), and quality of life mean difference -0.90 [95% CI, -1.18 to -0.62]). There was no difference in relief of ocular symptoms (SMD -0.08 [95% CI, -0.23 to 0.08]). In addition, four randomized controlled trials were included in a narrative analysis. The results in the narrative analysis were comparable with those found in the meta-analysis.

CONCLUSION

INS were superior to OAs in improving nasal symptoms and quality of life in patients with AR.

Для цитирования: Juel-Berg Nanna, Darling Peter, Bolvig Julie, Foss-Skiftesvik Majken H, Halken Susanne, Winther Lone, Hansen Kirsten Skamstrup, Askjaer Nikolaj, Heegaard Steffen, Madsen Anders R, Opstrup Morten S. Intranasal corticosteroids compared with oral antihistamines in allergic rhinitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.. American journal of rhinology & allergy. 2017. DOI: 10.2500/ajra.2016.30.4397.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.