MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.7181/acfs.2016.17.2.77

Медицинская библиотека · Archives of craniofacial surgery · 2016

Improvement of Infraorbital Rim contour Using Medpor.

Hwang So Min, Park Seong Hyuk, Lee Jong Seo, Kim Hyung Do, Hwang Min Kyu, Kim Min Wook

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Asymmetry of the infraorbital rim can be caused by trauma, congenital or acquired disease, or insufficient reduction during a previous operation. Such asymmetry needs to be corrected because the shape of the infraorbital rim or midfacial skeleton defines the overall midfacial contour.

METHODS

The study included 5 cases of retruded infraorbital rim. All of the patient underwent restoration of the deficient volume using polyethylene implants between June 2005 and June 2011. The infraorbital rim was accessed through a subciliary approach, and the implants were placed in subperiosteal space. Surgical outcomes were evaluated using preoperative and postoperative computed tomography studies.

RESULTS

Implant based augmentation was associated with a mean projection of 4.6 mm enhancement. No postoperative complications were noted during the 30-month follow-up period.

CONCLUSION

Because of the safeness, short recovery time, effectiveness, reliability, and potential application to a wide range of facial disproportion problems, this surgical technique can be applied to midfacial retrusion from a variety of etiologies, such as fracture involving infraorbital rim, congenital midfacial hypoplasia, lid malposition after blepharoplasty, and skeletal changes due to aging.

Для цитирования: Hwang So Min, Park Seong Hyuk, Lee Jong Seo, Kim Hyung Do, Hwang Min Kyu, Kim Min Wook. Improvement of Infraorbital Rim contour Using Medpor.. Archives of craniofacial surgery. 2016. DOI: 10.7181/acfs.2016.17.2.77.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.