International journal of radiation biology · 1998
Comparison of radiation-induced aberration frequencies in chromosomes 1 and 2 of two human donors.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Wojcik A, Streffer C
Аннотация
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to analyse donor and time dependent variations in the frequencies of radiation-induced aberrations in chromosomes 1 and 2.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Human lymphocytes from two donors were irradiated with 1 and 2 Gy of X-rays. Chromosomal aberrations were scored in chromosomes 1 and 2 painted with different fluorochromes and in Giemsa stained cells. Two time displaced experiments were performed with lymphocytes of each donor.
RESULTS: In cells of both donors chromosome 1 was generally more frequently involved in translocations than chromosome 2. This result was not always reproducible. Chromosome 2 showed a higher frequency of acentric fragments, especially following a dose of 1 Gy. Again interexperimental variations were observed. No differences between the two chromosomes were seen with regard to other aberration types. Both chromosomes showed less dicentrics and more acentric fragments than proportional to their DNA content.
CONCLUSIONS: Chromosomes 1 and 2 show a different sensitivity to ionizing radiation. The difference is dependent on the aberration type and is not always reproducible. This variability could contribute to the difficulty in reaching a consensus regarding the radiosensitivity of individual chromosomes.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Human lymphocytes from two donors were irradiated with 1 and 2 Gy of X-rays. Chromosomal aberrations were scored in chromosomes 1 and 2 painted with different fluorochromes and in Giemsa stained cells. Two time displaced experiments were performed with lymphocytes of each donor.
RESULTS: In cells of both donors chromosome 1 was generally more frequently involved in translocations than chromosome 2. This result was not always reproducible. Chromosome 2 showed a higher frequency of acentric fragments, especially following a dose of 1 Gy. Again interexperimental variations were observed. No differences between the two chromosomes were seen with regard to other aberration types. Both chromosomes showed less dicentrics and more acentric fragments than proportional to their DNA content.
CONCLUSIONS: Chromosomes 1 and 2 show a different sensitivity to ionizing radiation. The difference is dependent on the aberration type and is not always reproducible. This variability could contribute to the difficulty in reaching a consensus regarding the radiosensitivity of individual chromosomes.