European journal of radiology · 2021
Noninvasive assessment of clinically significant portal hypertension using ΔT1 of the liver and spleen and ECV of the spleen on routine Gd-EOB-DTPA liver MRI.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Catucci Damiano, Obmann Verena Carola, Berzigotti Annalisa, Gräni Christoph, Guensch Dominik Paul, Fischer Kady, Ebner Lukas, Heverhagen Johannes Thomas, Christe Andreas, Huber Adrian Thomas
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To analyze the predictive value of ΔT1 of the liver and spleen as well as the extracellular volume fraction (ECV) of the spleen as noninvasive biomarkers for the determination of clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH) on routine Gd-EOB-DTPA liver MRI.
METHOD: 195 consecutive patients with known or suspected chronic liver disease from 9/2018 to 7/2019 with Gd-EOB-DTPA liver MRI and abdominal T1 mapping were retrospectively included. Based on the presence of splenomegaly with thrombocytopenia, ascites and portosystemic collaterals, the patients were divided into noCSPH (n = 113), compensated CSPH (cCSPH, ≥1 finding without ascites; n = 55) and decompensated CSPH (dCSPH, ascites ± other findings; n = 27). T1 times were measured in the liver, spleen and abdominal aorta in the unenhanced and contrast-enhanced T1 maps. Native T1 times and ΔT1 of the liver and spleen as well as ECV of the spleen were compared between groups using the Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn's post hoc test. Furthermore, cutoff values for group differentiation were calculated using ROC analysis with Youden's index.
RESULTS: ΔT1 of the liver was significantly lower in patients with cCSPH and dCSPH (p < 0.001) compared to patients with noCSPH. In the ROC analyses for differentiation between noCSPH and CSPH (cCSPH + dCSPH), a cutoff of < 0.67 for ΔT1 of the liver (AUC = 0.79) performed better than ΔT1 (AUC = 0.69) and ECV (AUC = 0.63) of the spleen with cutoffs of > 0.29 and > 41.9, respectively.
CONCLUSION: ΔT1 of the liver and spleen in addition to ECV of the spleen allow for determination of CSPH on routine Gd-EOB-DTPA liver MRI.
METHOD: 195 consecutive patients with known or suspected chronic liver disease from 9/2018 to 7/2019 with Gd-EOB-DTPA liver MRI and abdominal T1 mapping were retrospectively included. Based on the presence of splenomegaly with thrombocytopenia, ascites and portosystemic collaterals, the patients were divided into noCSPH (n = 113), compensated CSPH (cCSPH, ≥1 finding without ascites; n = 55) and decompensated CSPH (dCSPH, ascites ± other findings; n = 27). T1 times were measured in the liver, spleen and abdominal aorta in the unenhanced and contrast-enhanced T1 maps. Native T1 times and ΔT1 of the liver and spleen as well as ECV of the spleen were compared between groups using the Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn's post hoc test. Furthermore, cutoff values for group differentiation were calculated using ROC analysis with Youden's index.
RESULTS: ΔT1 of the liver was significantly lower in patients with cCSPH and dCSPH (p < 0.001) compared to patients with noCSPH. In the ROC analyses for differentiation between noCSPH and CSPH (cCSPH + dCSPH), a cutoff of < 0.67 for ΔT1 of the liver (AUC = 0.79) performed better than ΔT1 (AUC = 0.69) and ECV (AUC = 0.63) of the spleen with cutoffs of > 0.29 and > 41.9, respectively.
CONCLUSION: ΔT1 of the liver and spleen in addition to ECV of the spleen allow for determination of CSPH on routine Gd-EOB-DTPA liver MRI.