The Journal of infection · 2024
Comparison of safety and immunogenicity in the elderly after receiving either Comirnaty or Spikevax monovalent XBB1.5 COVID-19 vaccine.
СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Mok Chris Ka Pun, Tang Yun Sang, Tan Chee Wah, Chong Ka Chun, Chen Chunke, Sun Yuanxin, Yiu Karen, Ling Kwun Cheung, Chan Ken Kp, Hui David S
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The emergence of SARS-CoV-2 variants necessitates ongoing evaluation of vaccine performance. This study evaluates and compares the safety and immunogenicity of the Comirnaty and Spikevax monovalent XBB.1.5 COVID-19 vaccines in an elderly population.
METHODS: Altogether, 129 elderly individuals were recruited between 2 January and 3 February 2024, and received a booster dose of either Comirnaty (n=59) or Spikevax (n=70) monovalent XBB.1.5 COVID-19 vaccine. Blood samples were collected at before and one month after vaccination. Immunogenicity was assessed by measuring the percentage of IFNγ+CD4+ and IFNγ+CD8+ T cells, and neutralizing antibody titers (NT50) using a surrogate virus neutralization test (sVNT). Adverse reactions were recorded and analyzed.
FINDINGS: Both vaccines significantly increased the percentage of IFNγ+CD8+ T cells against XBB.1.5 and wild-type (WT) SARS-CoV-2 at one-month post-vaccination. Spikevax induced a significantly higher percentages of IFNγ+CD8+ and CD4+ T cells against XBB.1.5 than Comirnaty (p<0.001). The proportion of participants showing a positive T cell response to XBB1.5 after vaccination was higher in the Spikevax group (64.3% CD8, 71.4% CD4) than in the Comirnaty group (42.4% CD8, 57.6% CD4). Spikevax also elicited higher NT50 levels against XBB1.5, JN.1 and the latest variant KP.2 than Comirnaty (XBB1.5: p<0.01; KP.2: p<0.05). Fever was more common in the Spikevax group (fever: p=0.006). However, all side effects were short-term and resolved on their own.
INTERPRETATION: Both vaccines induce neutralizing antibody to XBB1.5, JN.1 and KP.2. Specifically, Spikevax induces higher cellular and humoral immune responses than Comirnaty in the elderly, but it is also associated with a higher incidence of fever. These findings can guide public health strategies for vaccinating the elderly population.
METHODS: Altogether, 129 elderly individuals were recruited between 2 January and 3 February 2024, and received a booster dose of either Comirnaty (n=59) or Spikevax (n=70) monovalent XBB.1.5 COVID-19 vaccine. Blood samples were collected at before and one month after vaccination. Immunogenicity was assessed by measuring the percentage of IFNγ+CD4+ and IFNγ+CD8+ T cells, and neutralizing antibody titers (NT50) using a surrogate virus neutralization test (sVNT). Adverse reactions were recorded and analyzed.
FINDINGS: Both vaccines significantly increased the percentage of IFNγ+CD8+ T cells against XBB.1.5 and wild-type (WT) SARS-CoV-2 at one-month post-vaccination. Spikevax induced a significantly higher percentages of IFNγ+CD8+ and CD4+ T cells against XBB.1.5 than Comirnaty (p<0.001). The proportion of participants showing a positive T cell response to XBB1.5 after vaccination was higher in the Spikevax group (64.3% CD8, 71.4% CD4) than in the Comirnaty group (42.4% CD8, 57.6% CD4). Spikevax also elicited higher NT50 levels against XBB1.5, JN.1 and the latest variant KP.2 than Comirnaty (XBB1.5: p<0.01; KP.2: p<0.05). Fever was more common in the Spikevax group (fever: p=0.006). However, all side effects were short-term and resolved on their own.
INTERPRETATION: Both vaccines induce neutralizing antibody to XBB1.5, JN.1 and KP.2. Specifically, Spikevax induces higher cellular and humoral immune responses than Comirnaty in the elderly, but it is also associated with a higher incidence of fever. These findings can guide public health strategies for vaccinating the elderly population.