MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/01.prs.0000240818.64018.2a

Медицинская библиотека · Plastic and reconstructive surgery · 2006

Orbitofacial cleft number 5: radiographic, anatomical, and histologic study of a 24-week-old fetus.

Cannistrà Claudio, Bontemps Claire, Valero Rodrigo, Iannetti Giorgio, Barbet J Patrick

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Orbitofacial clefts are caused by a congenital absence of midfacial tissues between the eye and the upper lip just medial to the corner of the mouth. As a whole, facial clefts occur with an incidence of 1.43 to 4.85 per 100,000 births. The exact incidence of these unusual orbital facial clefts is unknown. Only a few clinical cases and their treatment have been reported in the world literature, and no anatomical or histologic study has been presented.

METHODS

The authors present a detailed anatomical and histologic study in a 24-week-old fetus with a right-side no. 5 orbitofacial cleft (according to Tessier's classification).

RESULTS

During the anatomical dissection, it was observed that in the trigeminal Gasser ganglion on the right side there was no infraorbital branch of this nerve. Both the foramen rotundum and the infraorbital groove, where the nerve exits, were hypotrophic.

CONCLUSION

After embryologic analysis of their observation, the authors propose that the orbitofacial no. 5 cleft should be considered as a tissular disruption of the face secondary to damage of the terminal branches of the maxillary nerve.

Для цитирования: Cannistrà Claudio, Bontemps Claire, Valero Rodrigo, Iannetti Giorgio, Barbet J Patrick. Orbitofacial cleft number 5: radiographic, anatomical, and histologic study of a 24-week-old fetus.. Plastic and reconstructive surgery. 2006. DOI: 10.1097/01.prs.0000240818.64018.2a.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.