Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
Glucagon-like peptide-1 agonists in Parkinson's disease: a meta-analysis.
СтатьяМетаанализОбзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Abdallah Amr Khalid, Harb Ahmed, Mansour Anas, Nasreldin Asmaa, Hamdy Rofida, Hatem Nourhan, Mosad Nada, Hamouda Mohamed, Hamouda Abdelrahman, Arumaithurai Kogulavadanan
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Type 2 diabetes and Parkinson's disease (PD) share underlying pathways, including insulin resistance and neuroinflammation. While glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) show neuroprotective promise in preclinical models, clinical trials have produced conflicting results. This meta-analysis systematically evaluates the efficacy and safety of GLP-1 RAs in PD, specifically distinguishing between symptomatic relief and potential disease modification.
METHODS: We searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Embase through November 2025 for randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of GLP-1 RAs in idiopathic PD. The primary motor outcome, the Movement Disorder Society-Sponsored Revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) Part III (motor examination), was analyzed using a random-effects model and strictly stratified by "ON" versus "OFF" medication states.
RESULTS: We included four high-quality trials comprising 667 patients. GLP-1 RAs failed to significantly improve motor function in either the OFF-medication state (mean difference [MD] - 0.69; 95% confidence interval [CI] - 2.81 to 1.43; p = 0.52) or ON-medication state (MD - 0.86; 95% CI - 3.35 to 1.63; p = 0.50). Furthermore, no meaningful benefits emerged for non-motor symptoms, cognition, or quality of life. Conversely, treatment significantly increased gastrointestinal adverse events, including nausea (risk ratio [RR] = 2.48), vomiting (RR = 4.53), and clinically concerning weight loss (RR = 3.32).
CONCLUSIONS: Synthesizing the latest phase 3 data, current GLP-1 RAs offer neither disease-modifying nor symptomatic motor benefits for the broader PD population. Given the pronounced risk of weight loss, their routine use is unwarranted. Future trials must shift focus toward biologically enriched subgroups or newer-generation incretin analogs.
METHODS: We searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Embase through November 2025 for randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of GLP-1 RAs in idiopathic PD. The primary motor outcome, the Movement Disorder Society-Sponsored Revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) Part III (motor examination), was analyzed using a random-effects model and strictly stratified by "ON" versus "OFF" medication states.
RESULTS: We included four high-quality trials comprising 667 patients. GLP-1 RAs failed to significantly improve motor function in either the OFF-medication state (mean difference [MD] - 0.69; 95% confidence interval [CI] - 2.81 to 1.43; p = 0.52) or ON-medication state (MD - 0.86; 95% CI - 3.35 to 1.63; p = 0.50). Furthermore, no meaningful benefits emerged for non-motor symptoms, cognition, or quality of life. Conversely, treatment significantly increased gastrointestinal adverse events, including nausea (risk ratio [RR] = 2.48), vomiting (RR = 4.53), and clinically concerning weight loss (RR = 3.32).
CONCLUSIONS: Synthesizing the latest phase 3 data, current GLP-1 RAs offer neither disease-modifying nor symptomatic motor benefits for the broader PD population. Given the pronounced risk of weight loss, their routine use is unwarranted. Future trials must shift focus toward biologically enriched subgroups or newer-generation incretin analogs.