The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians · 2015
Is there a difference in the maternal and neonatal outcomes between patients discharged after 24 h versus 72 h following cesarean section? A prospective randomized observational study on 2998 patients.
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Bayoumi Yomna Ali, Bassiouny Yasmin Ahmed, Hassan Ayman Ahmed, Gouda Hisham Mohamed, Zaki Sherif Sameh, Abdelrazek Abdelrahman Ahmed
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To compare the incidence of postpartum maternal and neonatal complications and hospital readmission in patients discharged 24 versus 72 h after cesarean section.
METHODS: Using randomization, 1495 patients were discharged after 24 h and 1503 patients were discharged after 72 h. All patients fulfilled the discharge criteria. Patients were assessed 6 weeks after delivery, any maternal or neonatal problems or hospital readmissions during this time interval were reported.
RESULTS: There was no difference in maternal hospital readmission between the two groups, but there was a significantly higher neonatal readmission rate in the 24-h group mainly due to neonatal jaundice. As for the complications reported after 6 weeks, the only two significant outcomes were initiating breast feeding, being significantly higher in the 72-h group [OR and 95% CI 0.77 (0.66-0.89)] and the mood swings being significantly lower in the 72-h group [OR and 95% CI 2.28 (1.94-2.68)].
CONCLUSION: Our recommendation is still in favor of late discharge, after cesarean delivery. Bearing in mind, that an early 24-h discharge, after cesarean delivery is feasible, but with special care of the neonate, with early visit to the pediatrician and early establishment of effective lactation.
METHODS: Using randomization, 1495 patients were discharged after 24 h and 1503 patients were discharged after 72 h. All patients fulfilled the discharge criteria. Patients were assessed 6 weeks after delivery, any maternal or neonatal problems or hospital readmissions during this time interval were reported.
RESULTS: There was no difference in maternal hospital readmission between the two groups, but there was a significantly higher neonatal readmission rate in the 24-h group mainly due to neonatal jaundice. As for the complications reported after 6 weeks, the only two significant outcomes were initiating breast feeding, being significantly higher in the 72-h group [OR and 95% CI 0.77 (0.66-0.89)] and the mood swings being significantly lower in the 72-h group [OR and 95% CI 2.28 (1.94-2.68)].
CONCLUSION: Our recommendation is still in favor of late discharge, after cesarean delivery. Bearing in mind, that an early 24-h discharge, after cesarean delivery is feasible, but with special care of the neonate, with early visit to the pediatrician and early establishment of effective lactation.