MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.15441/ceem.14.055

Медицинская библиотека · Clinical and experimental emergency medicine · 2015

Pediatric head injury: a pain for the emergency physician?

Chong Shu-Ling, Lee Khai Pin, Lee Jan Hau, Ong Gene Yong-Kwang, Ong Marcus Eng Hock

ОбзорСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

The prompt diagnosis and initial management of pediatric traumatic brain injury poses many challenges to the emergency department (ED) physician. In this review, we aim to appraise the literature on specific management issues faced in the ED, specifically: indications for neuroimaging, choice of sedatives, applicability of hyperventilation, utility of hyperosmolar agents, prophylactic anti-epileptics, and effect of hypothermia in traumatic brain injury. A comprehensive literature search of PubMed and Embase was performed in each specific area of focus corresponding to the relevant questions. The majority of the head injured patients presenting to the ED are mild and can be observed. Clinical prediction rules assist the ED physician in deciding if neuroimaging is warranted. In cases of major head injury, prompt airway control and careful use of sedation are necessary to minimize the chance of hypoxia, while avoiding hyperventilation. Hyperosmolar agents should be started in these cases and normothermia maintained. The majority of the evidence is derived from adult studies, and most treatment modalities are still controversial. Recent multicenter trials have highlighted the need to establish common platforms for further collaboration.

Для цитирования: Chong Shu-Ling, Lee Khai Pin, Lee Jan Hau, Ong Gene Yong-Kwang, Ong Marcus Eng Hock. Pediatric head injury: a pain for the emergency physician?. Clinical and experimental emergency medicine. 2015. DOI: 10.15441/ceem.14.055.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.