World journal of gastroenterology · 2025
Prognostic model for esophagogastric variceal rebleeding after endoscopic treatment in liver cirrhosis: A Chinese multicenter study.
СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеВалидационное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Zhan Jun-Yi, Chen Jie, Yu Jin-Zhong, Xu Fei-Peng, Xing Fei-Fei, Wang De-Xin, Yang Ming-Yan, Xing Feng, Wang Jian, Mu Yong-Ping
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Rebleeding after recovery from esophagogastric variceal bleeding (EGVB) is a severe complication that is associated with high rates of both incidence and mortality. Despite its clinical importance, recognized prognostic models that can effectively predict esophagogastric variceal rebleeding in patients with liver cirrhosis are lacking.
AIM: To construct and externally validate a reliable prognostic model for predicting the occurrence of esophagogastric variceal rebleeding.
METHODS: This study included 477 EGVB patients across 2 cohorts: The derivation cohort (n = 322) and the validation cohort (n = 155). The primary outcome was rebleeding events within 1 year. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator was applied for predictor selection, and multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to construct the prognostic model. Internal validation was performed with bootstrap resampling. We assessed the discrimination, calibration and accuracy of the model, and performed patient risk stratification.
RESULTS: Six predictors, including albumin and aspartate aminotransferase concentrations, white blood cell count, and the presence of ascites, portal vein thrombosis, and bleeding signs, were selected for the rebleeding event prediction following endoscopic treatment (REPET) model. In predicting rebleeding within 1 year, the REPET model exhibited a concordance index of 0.775 and a Brier score of 0.143 in the derivation cohort, alongside 0.862 and 0.127 in the validation cohort. Furthermore, the REPET model revealed a significant difference in rebleeding rates (P < 0.01) between low-risk patients and intermediate- to high-risk patients in both cohorts.
CONCLUSION: We constructed and validated a new prognostic model for variceal rebleeding with excellent predictive performance, which will improve the clinical management of rebleeding in EGVB patients.
AIM: To construct and externally validate a reliable prognostic model for predicting the occurrence of esophagogastric variceal rebleeding.
METHODS: This study included 477 EGVB patients across 2 cohorts: The derivation cohort (n = 322) and the validation cohort (n = 155). The primary outcome was rebleeding events within 1 year. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator was applied for predictor selection, and multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to construct the prognostic model. Internal validation was performed with bootstrap resampling. We assessed the discrimination, calibration and accuracy of the model, and performed patient risk stratification.
RESULTS: Six predictors, including albumin and aspartate aminotransferase concentrations, white blood cell count, and the presence of ascites, portal vein thrombosis, and bleeding signs, were selected for the rebleeding event prediction following endoscopic treatment (REPET) model. In predicting rebleeding within 1 year, the REPET model exhibited a concordance index of 0.775 and a Brier score of 0.143 in the derivation cohort, alongside 0.862 and 0.127 in the validation cohort. Furthermore, the REPET model revealed a significant difference in rebleeding rates (P < 0.01) between low-risk patients and intermediate- to high-risk patients in both cohorts.
CONCLUSION: We constructed and validated a new prognostic model for variceal rebleeding with excellent predictive performance, which will improve the clinical management of rebleeding in EGVB patients.