Pediatrics international : official journal of the Japan Pediatric Society · 2020
Evaluation of respiratory center function in congenital central hypoventilation syndrome by monitoring electrical activity of the diaphragm.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Yamada Yosuke, Hasegawa Hisaya, Henmi Nobuhide, Tsuruta Shio, Wasa Masanori, Kihara Hirotaka, Kodera Takayuki, Kouyama Toshinari, Kumazawa Kensuke
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: A definitive diagnosis of congenital central hypoventilation syndrome (CCHS) is made by genetic testing. However, there are only a few examinations that warrant genetic testing. Electrical activity of the diaphragm (Edi) reflects neural respiratory drive from respiratory center to diaphragm. We evaluated the function of the respiratory center in CCHS by Edi monitoring.
METHODS: Monitoring of Edi was performed in six CCHS cases without mechanical ventilation. The monitoring time was 30 consecutive minutes from wakefulness to sleep. The TcPCO2 or EtCO2 and SpO2 were recorded simultaneously.
RESULTS: The Edi peak during wakefulness was 14.0 (10.3-21.0) µV and the Edi peak during sleep was 6.7 (3.8-8.0) µV. The Edi peak during sleep was significantly lower than the Edi peak during wakefulness, and patients were in a state of hypoventilation. Although TcPCO2 or EtCO2 increased due to hypoventilation, an increase in the Edi peak that reflects central respiratory drive was not observed. ΔEdi/ΔCO2 was -0.06μV/mmHg. Maximum EtCO2 or TcPco2 was 51 mmHg, and the average SpO2 was 91.5% during monitoring.
CONCLUSIONS: We confirmed that Edi monitoring could evaluate the function of the respiratory center and reproduce the hypoventilation of CCHS. The present study suggested that Edi monitoring is a useful examination in deciding whether to perform genetic testing or not and it may lead to an early diagnosis of CCHS.
METHODS: Monitoring of Edi was performed in six CCHS cases without mechanical ventilation. The monitoring time was 30 consecutive minutes from wakefulness to sleep. The TcPCO2 or EtCO2 and SpO2 were recorded simultaneously.
RESULTS: The Edi peak during wakefulness was 14.0 (10.3-21.0) µV and the Edi peak during sleep was 6.7 (3.8-8.0) µV. The Edi peak during sleep was significantly lower than the Edi peak during wakefulness, and patients were in a state of hypoventilation. Although TcPCO2 or EtCO2 increased due to hypoventilation, an increase in the Edi peak that reflects central respiratory drive was not observed. ΔEdi/ΔCO2 was -0.06μV/mmHg. Maximum EtCO2 or TcPco2 was 51 mmHg, and the average SpO2 was 91.5% during monitoring.
CONCLUSIONS: We confirmed that Edi monitoring could evaluate the function of the respiratory center and reproduce the hypoventilation of CCHS. The present study suggested that Edi monitoring is a useful examination in deciding whether to perform genetic testing or not and it may lead to an early diagnosis of CCHS.