International journal of radiation biology · 1998
DNA-proportional distribution of radiation-induced chromosome aberrations analysed by fluorescence in situ hybridization painting of all chromosomes of a human female karyotype.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Barquinero J F, Knehr S, Braselmann H, Figel M, Bauchinger M
Аннотация
PURPOSE: This is the extension of a previous study, showing deviations from a DNA-proportional involvement of 12 single chromosomes (1-4, 6-10, 12, 14 and X) in radiation-induced translocations and dicentrics measured by FISH-painting and classified by standard cytogenetic scoring criteria. By adding data on chromosomes 2, 4, 5, 9, 11-13, 15-22 and X the analysis now comprises all chromosomes of a human female karyotype evaluated with three nomenclature systems (PAINT, S & S and a conventional method).
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Metaphase spreads were prepared from lymphocytes irradiated with 3 Gy 220 kV X-rays. FISH painting was performed with single chromosome-specific probes in combination with a pancentromeric probe.
RESULTS: Deviations from a DNA-proportional distribution became apparent for all aberration parameters analysed with the three nomenclature systems. Chromosomes 2, 3 and 6 were less frequently involved and chromosomes 16, 17 and 20 were more frequently involved in exchange aberrations. Generally, smaller chromosomes (15-22, with the exception of chromosome 19) were more frequently involved in aberration formation than expected.
CONCLUSION: The assumption that the probability of a chromosome being involved in an exchange aberration is proportional to its DNA content is not supported by the present data.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Metaphase spreads were prepared from lymphocytes irradiated with 3 Gy 220 kV X-rays. FISH painting was performed with single chromosome-specific probes in combination with a pancentromeric probe.
RESULTS: Deviations from a DNA-proportional distribution became apparent for all aberration parameters analysed with the three nomenclature systems. Chromosomes 2, 3 and 6 were less frequently involved and chromosomes 16, 17 and 20 were more frequently involved in exchange aberrations. Generally, smaller chromosomes (15-22, with the exception of chromosome 19) were more frequently involved in aberration formation than expected.
CONCLUSION: The assumption that the probability of a chromosome being involved in an exchange aberration is proportional to its DNA content is not supported by the present data.