International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2006
Choice of surgery for stress incontinence.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Robert Magali, Farrell Scott A, Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To outline the evidence for the efficacy of surgical procedures used for the primary treatment of urinary incontinence.
OPTIONS: The range of surgical options available for the primary treatment of urinary incontinence in women.
OUTCOMES: The best possible outcomes for women undergoing primary surgery for urinary incontinence. To provide a current understanding of the evidence available as the basis of an informed discussion of the anticipated outcome of surgery.
EVIDENCE: A systematic review of clinical trials of the outcomes of primary surgical treatment of urinary incontinence.
VALUES: The quality of the evidence is rated using the criteria described by the Canadian Task Force on periodic health examination (Table).
BENEFITS, HARMS, AND COSTS: Careful consideration of the surgical options available will result in informed choice, which is essential to the process of determining the most appropriate surgery for a woman. Use of a range of surgeries that have the highest proven efficacy is most likely to result in long-term patient satisfaction.
OPTIONS: The range of surgical options available for the primary treatment of urinary incontinence in women.
OUTCOMES: The best possible outcomes for women undergoing primary surgery for urinary incontinence. To provide a current understanding of the evidence available as the basis of an informed discussion of the anticipated outcome of surgery.
EVIDENCE: A systematic review of clinical trials of the outcomes of primary surgical treatment of urinary incontinence.
VALUES: The quality of the evidence is rated using the criteria described by the Canadian Task Force on periodic health examination (Table).
BENEFITS, HARMS, AND COSTS: Careful consideration of the surgical options available will result in informed choice, which is essential to the process of determining the most appropriate surgery for a woman. Use of a range of surgeries that have the highest proven efficacy is most likely to result in long-term patient satisfaction.