m+Medelevator.RU
← Поиск публикаций
The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2024

Cost-utility analysis of molnupiravir for high-risk, community-based adults with COVID-19: an economic evaluation of the PANORAMIC trial.

СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Png May Ee, Harris Victoria, Grabey Jenna, Hart Nigel D, Jani Bhautesh D, Butler Daniel, Carson-Stevens Andrew, Coates Maria, Cureton Lucy, Dobson Melissa, Dorward Jienchi, Evans Philip, Francis Nick, Gbinigie Oghenekome A, Hayward Gail, Holmes Jane, Hood Kerenza, Khoo Saye, Ahmed Haroon, Lown Mark, McKenna Micheal, Mort Sam, Nguyen-Van-Tam Jonathan S, Rahman Najib M, Richards Duncan B, Thomas Nicholas Pb, van Hecke Oliver, Hobbs Richard, Little Paul, Yu Ly-Mee, Butler Christopher C, Petrou Stavros, PANORAMIC Trial Collaborators

Аннотация

BACKGROUND: The cost-effectiveness of molnupiravir, an oral antiviral for early treatment of SARS-CoV-2, has not been established in vaccinated populations.

AIM: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of molnupiravir relative to usual care alone among mainly vaccinated community-based people at higher risk of severe outcomes from COVID-19 over 6 months.

DESIGN AND SETTING: An economic evaluation of the PANORAMIC trial in the UK.

METHOD: A cost-utility analysis that adopted a UK NHS and personal social services perspective and a 6-month time horizon was performed using PANORAMIC trial data. Cost-effectiveness was expressed in terms of incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained. Sensitivity and subgroup analyses assessed the impacts of uncertainty and heterogeneity. Threshold analysis explored the price for molnupiravir consistent with likely reimbursement.

RESULTS: In the base-case analysis, molnupiravir had higher mean costs of £449 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 445 to 453) and higher mean QALYs of 0.0055 (95% CI = 0.0044 to 0.0067) than usual care (mean incremental cost per QALY of £81 190). Sensitivity and subgroup analyses showed similar results, except for those aged ≥75 years, with a 55% probability of being cost-effective at a £30 000 per QALY threshold. Molnupiravir would have to be priced around £147 per course to be cost-effective at a £15 000 per QALY threshold.

CONCLUSION: At the current cost of £513 per course, molnupiravir is unlikely to be cost-effective relative to usual care over a 6-month time horizon among mainly vaccinated patients with COVID-19 at increased risk of adverse outcomes, except those aged ≥75 years.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

ИП Урсолов Владлен Сергеевич

ИНН 500118482352 · ОГРНИП 314500117700049

Реквизиты и контакты