American journal of clinical pathology · 2021
Mucinous Adenocarcinoma With Intrapulmonary Metastasis Harboring KRAS and GNAS Mutations Arising in Congenital Pulmonary Airway Malformation.
Клинический случайСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАОбзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
de Cordova Ximena Fernandez, Wang Huiying, Mehrad Mitra, Eisenberg Rosana, Johnson Joyce, Wei Qiang, Borinstein Scott, Danko Melissa E, Liang Jiancong
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: Mucinous adenocarcinoma arising in unresected congenital pulmonary airway malformation (CPAM) is rare. Underlying driver mutations in addition to KRAS gain-of-function mutations in this setting and the long-term outcomes of these patients are unknown.
METHODS: We report a case of metastatic mucinous adenocarcinoma harboring both KRAS and GNAS mutations arising in a type 1 CPAM of a 14-year-old male. A literature review was performed.
RESULTS: Next-generation sequencing revealed identical KRAS (G12V) mutations in both the CPAM and metastatic adenocarcinoma and a missense mutation in the GNAS (R201C) gene in the metastatic adenocarcinoma only. Median survival was 23 and 4 years for patients with localized (no or limited spread within the same lobe of CPAM) and distant involvement (spread to any different lobe of CPAM) of mucinous cells, respectively (95% confidence interval, 23-23 and 1.5-22 years, respectively; P = .017).
CONCLUSIONS: Mucinous cell proliferation associated with type 1 CPAM has exceptionally good long-term outcomes if confined within the same lobe of CPAM. A second oncogenic mutation in the GNAS gene may be necessary for progression to malignancy and distant spread.
METHODS: We report a case of metastatic mucinous adenocarcinoma harboring both KRAS and GNAS mutations arising in a type 1 CPAM of a 14-year-old male. A literature review was performed.
RESULTS: Next-generation sequencing revealed identical KRAS (G12V) mutations in both the CPAM and metastatic adenocarcinoma and a missense mutation in the GNAS (R201C) gene in the metastatic adenocarcinoma only. Median survival was 23 and 4 years for patients with localized (no or limited spread within the same lobe of CPAM) and distant involvement (spread to any different lobe of CPAM) of mucinous cells, respectively (95% confidence interval, 23-23 and 1.5-22 years, respectively; P = .017).
CONCLUSIONS: Mucinous cell proliferation associated with type 1 CPAM has exceptionally good long-term outcomes if confined within the same lobe of CPAM. A second oncogenic mutation in the GNAS gene may be necessary for progression to malignancy and distant spread.