Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV · 2014
MR-guided laser-induced thermotherapy (LITT) in patients with liver metastases of uveal melanoma.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Eichler K, Zangos S, Gruber-Rouh T, Vogl T J, Mack M G
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Evaluation of the local tumour control rate and survival data for magnetic resonance (MR) imaging-guided laser ablation of uveal malignant melanoma liver metastases by using laser-induced interstitial thermotherapy (LITT).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The LITT was performed in 18 patients with liver metastases (n = 44) from uveal malignant melanoma. All patients tolerated this intervention well. With the Kaplan-Meier method, the survival rates were calculated. Indications for the procedure were defined for patients with no more than five metastases, none of which were larger than 5 cm in diameter: The Indication for LITT treatment were recurrent liver metastases after partial liver resection (22%), locally non-resectable tumours (17%) or metastases in both liver lobes (61%).
RESULTS: The mean survival rate for all treated patients was 3.6 years (95% CI: 2.19, 5.06). We started the calculation on the date of diagnosis of the metastases treated with LITT. The median survival was 1.83 years; 1-year survival, 88%; 3-year survival 47%, 5-year survival 17%. Calculated after the first LITT treatment the median survival was 2.8 years (95% CI: 1.0, 5.0). 10 patients were treated by transarterial chemoembolization before LITT.
CONCLUSION: MR-guided LITT treatment shows a high local tumour control and survival rates in patients with liver metastases of uveal malignant melanoma.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The LITT was performed in 18 patients with liver metastases (n = 44) from uveal malignant melanoma. All patients tolerated this intervention well. With the Kaplan-Meier method, the survival rates were calculated. Indications for the procedure were defined for patients with no more than five metastases, none of which were larger than 5 cm in diameter: The Indication for LITT treatment were recurrent liver metastases after partial liver resection (22%), locally non-resectable tumours (17%) or metastases in both liver lobes (61%).
RESULTS: The mean survival rate for all treated patients was 3.6 years (95% CI: 2.19, 5.06). We started the calculation on the date of diagnosis of the metastases treated with LITT. The median survival was 1.83 years; 1-year survival, 88%; 3-year survival 47%, 5-year survival 17%. Calculated after the first LITT treatment the median survival was 2.8 years (95% CI: 1.0, 5.0). 10 patients were treated by transarterial chemoembolization before LITT.
CONCLUSION: MR-guided LITT treatment shows a high local tumour control and survival rates in patients with liver metastases of uveal malignant melanoma.