MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3109/13668250.2020.1763278

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of intellectual & developmental disability · 2020

Prevalence and risk factors of choking in older adults with intellectual disability: Results from a national cross-sectional study.

Manduchi Beatrice, Walshe Margaret, Burke Éilish, Carroll Rachael, McCallion Philip, McCarron Mary

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Choking is a serious and under-recognised condition for adults with intellectual disability (ID), with health, psychological and potentially fatal consequences. This study aims to determine the prevalence and risk factors for choking in a population-based sample of older adults with ID.

METHOD: 597 adults with ID (mean age: 60 years old; SD = 8) were selected as part of The Intellectual Disability Supplement to The Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing. Information was collected on choking history, comorbidities, challenging behaviours and eating difficulties. Logistic regression was employed to determine risk factors for choking history.

RESULTS

17.3% of participants reported choking history. Eating difficulties, cerebral palsy, visual impairment, being ≥ 65 years old and antipsychotic use increased the odds of choking history.

CONCLUSIONS

Choking is prevalent in our sample. Managing choking risk requires specific responsibilities from the multidisciplinary team. Risk assessment, training staff and caregivers should be implemented in usual care.

Для цитирования: Manduchi Beatrice, Walshe Margaret, Burke Éilish, Carroll Rachael, McCallion Philip, McCarron Mary. Prevalence and risk factors of choking in older adults with intellectual disability: Results from a national cross-sectional study.. Journal of intellectual & developmental disability. 2020. DOI: 10.3109/13668250.2020.1763278.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.