Infection · 2025
Evaluating Seqstant LiveGene Analysis in real-time assessment of metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) data from respiratory samples.
СтатьяОценочное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Boutin Sébastien, Klein Sabrina, Untergasser Gerold, Loka Tobias P, Jakob Suzan, Caf Yasemin, Khatamzas Elham, Knabl Ludwig, Wrettos Georg, Knobloch Henri, Nurjadi Dennis
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The detection of pathogens causing infections by conventional diagnostic methods can be challenging and next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology offers a promising alternative method. In this study, we evaluated the performance of real-time metagenomic next-generation sequencing (rt-mNGS) for the detection of pathogens in respiratory samples.
METHOD: We used rt-mNGS, using the Seqstant LiveGene Analysis platform, on 335 respiratory samples in comparison to conventional culture results.
RESULTS: We observed an overall good concordance in 71.64% (240/335) of the methods. The rt-mNGS outperformed the gold standard culture in 16.12% (54/335) of the samples, while the culture was superior in detecting the clinically relevant pathogen in 12.24% (41/335) of the samples. The non-inferiority of rt-mNGS was statistically significant (δ = 10, α = 0.05, 1 - β = 0.8). We also observed that the real-time analysis of NGS data is beneficial in obtaining reliable, timely results, as the initial report at cycle 46 exhibits a Positive Predictive Value (PPV) of 93.75% at the species-level with a sensitivity of 32.09%.
CONCLUSION: Overall, our study showed the non-inferiority of rt-mNGS compared to the standard-of-care microbiology for respiratory samples with statistical significance. Moreover, the rt-mNGS method exhibited superior sensitivity and superior overall performance. It also uniquely detected certain organisms that are typically hard to culture. However, rt-mNGS reported a higher number of false positives and faced limitations in detecting Aspergillus spp. In conclusion, the study highlights the potential of rt-mNGS as a powerful tool in clinical diagnostics of respiratory infections and beyond.
METHOD: We used rt-mNGS, using the Seqstant LiveGene Analysis platform, on 335 respiratory samples in comparison to conventional culture results.
RESULTS: We observed an overall good concordance in 71.64% (240/335) of the methods. The rt-mNGS outperformed the gold standard culture in 16.12% (54/335) of the samples, while the culture was superior in detecting the clinically relevant pathogen in 12.24% (41/335) of the samples. The non-inferiority of rt-mNGS was statistically significant (δ = 10, α = 0.05, 1 - β = 0.8). We also observed that the real-time analysis of NGS data is beneficial in obtaining reliable, timely results, as the initial report at cycle 46 exhibits a Positive Predictive Value (PPV) of 93.75% at the species-level with a sensitivity of 32.09%.
CONCLUSION: Overall, our study showed the non-inferiority of rt-mNGS compared to the standard-of-care microbiology for respiratory samples with statistical significance. Moreover, the rt-mNGS method exhibited superior sensitivity and superior overall performance. It also uniquely detected certain organisms that are typically hard to culture. However, rt-mNGS reported a higher number of false positives and faced limitations in detecting Aspergillus spp. In conclusion, the study highlights the potential of rt-mNGS as a powerful tool in clinical diagnostics of respiratory infections and beyond.