The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2014
Comparison of hip geometry, strength, and estimated fracture risk in women with anorexia nervosa and overweight/obese women.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Bachmann Katherine Neubecker, Fazeli Pouneh K, Lawson Elizabeth A, Russell Brian M, Riccio Ariana D, Meenaghan Erinne, Gerweck Anu V, Eddy Kamryn, Holmes Tara, Goldstein Mark, Weigel Thomas, Ebrahimi Seda, Mickley Diane, Gleysteen Suzanne, Bredella Miriam A, Klibanski Anne, Miller Karen K
Аннотация
CONTEXT: Data suggest that anorexia nervosa (AN) and obesity are complicated by elevated fracture risk, but skeletal site-specific data are lacking. Traditional bone mineral density (BMD) measurements are unsatisfactory at both weight extremes. Hip structural analysis (HSA) uses dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry data to estimate hip geometry and femoral strength. Factor of risk (φ) is the ratio of force applied to the hip from a fall with respect to femoral strength; higher values indicate higher hip fracture risk.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to investigate hip fracture risk in AN and overweight/obese women.
DESIGN: This was a cross-sectional study.
SETTING: The study was conducted at a Clinical Research Center.
PATIENTS: PATIENTS included 368 women (aged 19-45 y): 246 AN, 53 overweight/obese, and 69 lean controls.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: HSA-derived femoral geometry, peak factor of risk for hip fracture, and factor of risk for hip fracture attenuated by trochanteric soft tissue (φ(attenuated)) were measured.
RESULTS: Most HSA-derived parameters were impaired in AN and superior in obese/overweight women vs controls at the narrow neck, intertrochanteric, and femoral shaft (P ≤ .03). The φ(attenuated) was highest in AN and lowest in overweight/obese women (P < .0001). Lean mass was associated with superior, and duration of amenorrhea with inferior, HSA-derived parameters and φ(attenuated) (P < .05). Mean φ(attenuated) (P = .036), but not femoral neck BMD or HSA-estimated geometry, was impaired in women who had experienced fragility fractures.
CONCLUSIONS: Femoral geometry by HSA, hip BMD, and factor of risk for hip fracture attenuated by soft tissue are impaired in AN and superior in obesity, suggesting higher and lower hip fracture risk, respectively. Only attenuated factor of risk was associated with fragility fracture prevalence, suggesting that variability in soft tissue padding may help explain site-specific fracture risk not captured by BMD.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to investigate hip fracture risk in AN and overweight/obese women.
DESIGN: This was a cross-sectional study.
SETTING: The study was conducted at a Clinical Research Center.
PATIENTS: PATIENTS included 368 women (aged 19-45 y): 246 AN, 53 overweight/obese, and 69 lean controls.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: HSA-derived femoral geometry, peak factor of risk for hip fracture, and factor of risk for hip fracture attenuated by trochanteric soft tissue (φ(attenuated)) were measured.
RESULTS: Most HSA-derived parameters were impaired in AN and superior in obese/overweight women vs controls at the narrow neck, intertrochanteric, and femoral shaft (P ≤ .03). The φ(attenuated) was highest in AN and lowest in overweight/obese women (P < .0001). Lean mass was associated with superior, and duration of amenorrhea with inferior, HSA-derived parameters and φ(attenuated) (P < .05). Mean φ(attenuated) (P = .036), but not femoral neck BMD or HSA-estimated geometry, was impaired in women who had experienced fragility fractures.
CONCLUSIONS: Femoral geometry by HSA, hip BMD, and factor of risk for hip fracture attenuated by soft tissue are impaired in AN and superior in obesity, suggesting higher and lower hip fracture risk, respectively. Only attenuated factor of risk was associated with fragility fracture prevalence, suggesting that variability in soft tissue padding may help explain site-specific fracture risk not captured by BMD.