American journal of surgery · 2006
Therapeutic potentials of a novel method of dual-pulse gastric electrical stimulation for gastric dysrhythmia and symptoms of nausea and vomiting.
СтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Liu Jinsong, Qiao Xian, Chen Jiande D Z
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The aims of this study were to investigate the effects and mechanisms of a novel method of gastric electrical stimulation on the prevention of vasopressin-induced emetic response and gastric dysrhythmias.
METHODS: Fifteen dogs (10 normal, 5 vagotomized) chronically implanted with gastric serosal electrodes were used in a 3-session study (vasopressin, vasopressin plus 2-channel stimulation [DCS], and vasopressin plus dual-pulse stimulation [DPS]).
RESULTS: Vasopressin induced gastric dysrhythmias and motion sickness-like symptoms (P < .05) and these effects were blocked partially with vagotomy. Both methods of DCS and DPS were capable of preventing vasopressin-induced gastric dysrhythmias (P < .05) and motion sickness-like symptoms (P < .05). The antiemetic effects of the proposed methods of DCS and DPS were abolished by vagotomy but their antidysrhythmic effects were not blocked by vagotomy.
CONCLUSIONS: DCS and DPS are able to reduce vasopressin-induced gastric dysrhythmia and symptoms of nausea and vomiting. The vagal pathway is involved in the antiemetic effect but not the antidysrhythmic effect of the proposed methods of stimulation.
METHODS: Fifteen dogs (10 normal, 5 vagotomized) chronically implanted with gastric serosal electrodes were used in a 3-session study (vasopressin, vasopressin plus 2-channel stimulation [DCS], and vasopressin plus dual-pulse stimulation [DPS]).
RESULTS: Vasopressin induced gastric dysrhythmias and motion sickness-like symptoms (P < .05) and these effects were blocked partially with vagotomy. Both methods of DCS and DPS were capable of preventing vasopressin-induced gastric dysrhythmias (P < .05) and motion sickness-like symptoms (P < .05). The antiemetic effects of the proposed methods of DCS and DPS were abolished by vagotomy but their antidysrhythmic effects were not blocked by vagotomy.
CONCLUSIONS: DCS and DPS are able to reduce vasopressin-induced gastric dysrhythmia and symptoms of nausea and vomiting. The vagal pathway is involved in the antiemetic effect but not the antidysrhythmic effect of the proposed methods of stimulation.