Adverse events associated with laparoscopy vs laparotomy in the treatment of endometrial cancer.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the study was to compare adverse event rates between laparoscopic vs open surgery for endometrial cancer.

STUDY

DESIGN

This was a retrospective cohort study comparing 107 women who underwent laparoscopy with 269 age- and body mass index-matched women who underwent laparotomy for treatment of endometrial cancer.

RESULTS

Adverse event rates were similar between cohorts (37% laparoscopy vs 43% laparotomy, P=.248). Laparotomies had higher rates of cellulitis (16% vs 7%, P=.018) and open wound infection (9% vs 2%, P=.02), whereas laparoscopy had higher rates of sensory peripheral nerve deficit (5% vs 0%, P=.008) and lymphedema (7% vs 1%, P=.003). Laparoscopy was associated with longer mean operating room times but with shorter hospital stays and lower mean blood loss.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopy was associated with decreased rates of surgical site infections but had an increased risk of peripheral sensory nerve deficits and lymphedema when compared with laparotomy.