European journal of ophthalmology · 2023
Clinical and multimodal imaging findings in a case of serous maculopathy with absence of retinal pigment epithelium (SMARPE).
Клинический случайСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Oribio-Quinto Carlos, Herranz-Heras Juan Carlos, Burgos-Blasco Bárbara, Alarcon-Garcia Antonio Domingo, Fernández-Vigo José Ignacio
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: The differential diagnosis for serous SRF can involve diseases with widely different pathogenic mechanisms that can range from vascular ocular diseases to ocular tumours and paraneoplastic syndromes. Recently, van Dijk et al. have described in three patients a new entity which they have called serous maculopathy with an absence of retinal pigment epithelium (SMARPE). We hereby describe a case of this infrequent macular disease and report its characteristic findings on multimodal imaging.
CASE DESCRIPTION: We present the case of a 65-year-old hyperopic woman with a three-year history of visual acuity (VA) loss in her left eye. Prior optical coherence tomography (OCT) had revealed the presence of serous subretinal fluid that had shown no response to treatment with intravitreal injections. On swept source OCT angiography scan, no macular alterations in the retinal vascular plexus structure were noted and there was no evidence of choroidal neovascularization. Ultra-widefield fluorescence angiography of the left eye revealed an early hyperfluorescent macular spot corresponding to the area of absent RPE and late fluorescein pooling. On ultra-widefield indocyanine green angiography there were no central or peripheral abnormalities of choroidal vascularization.
CONCLUSION: This recently described entity should be considered as a differential diagnosis in persistent serous subretinal fluid. Multimodal imaging helps differentiate SMARPE from its main differential diagnoses, and care should be taken to identify and differentiate it from similar conditions to avoid unnecessary treatment with its possible side effects and complications.
CASE DESCRIPTION: We present the case of a 65-year-old hyperopic woman with a three-year history of visual acuity (VA) loss in her left eye. Prior optical coherence tomography (OCT) had revealed the presence of serous subretinal fluid that had shown no response to treatment with intravitreal injections. On swept source OCT angiography scan, no macular alterations in the retinal vascular plexus structure were noted and there was no evidence of choroidal neovascularization. Ultra-widefield fluorescence angiography of the left eye revealed an early hyperfluorescent macular spot corresponding to the area of absent RPE and late fluorescein pooling. On ultra-widefield indocyanine green angiography there were no central or peripheral abnormalities of choroidal vascularization.
CONCLUSION: This recently described entity should be considered as a differential diagnosis in persistent serous subretinal fluid. Multimodal imaging helps differentiate SMARPE from its main differential diagnoses, and care should be taken to identify and differentiate it from similar conditions to avoid unnecessary treatment with its possible side effects and complications.