Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2009
[Effect of abducens orthosis combined with walker on developmental dysplasia of the hip].
Сравнительное исследованиеАннотация на английскомСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Hu Zhiyong, Xu Yongqiang, Liang Jieyu, Li Kanghua, Liao Qiande
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of abducens orthosis combined with walker on developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH).
METHODS: A total of 126 patients (224 hips) with DDH aged 6-36 months in Xiangya Hospital was randomly divided into 2 groups: an orthosis combined with walker group and an improved hip frog cast fixation group. Seventy patients (130 hips) were treated by the orthosis combined with walker and 56 patients (94 hips) were treated by the improved hip frog cast fixation. We compared the effect and complications of the 2 groups.
RESULTS: The fineness rates of the orthosis combined with walker group and the improved hip frog cast fixation group were 89.2% and 90.4%, respectively, with no significant difference (P>0.05). The rate of femoral head osteonecrosis in the orthosis combined with walker group was significantly lower than that in the improved hip frog cast fixation group (1.5% vs. 5.3%,P<0.05), but the re-dislocation rate in the former was significantly higher than that in the latter (6.9% vs. 1.1 %, P<0.05).
CONCLUSION: Both methods are effective for DDH. Orthosis combined with walker has a lower proportion of femoral head osteonecrosis, but a higher proportion of re-dislocation.
METHODS: A total of 126 patients (224 hips) with DDH aged 6-36 months in Xiangya Hospital was randomly divided into 2 groups: an orthosis combined with walker group and an improved hip frog cast fixation group. Seventy patients (130 hips) were treated by the orthosis combined with walker and 56 patients (94 hips) were treated by the improved hip frog cast fixation. We compared the effect and complications of the 2 groups.
RESULTS: The fineness rates of the orthosis combined with walker group and the improved hip frog cast fixation group were 89.2% and 90.4%, respectively, with no significant difference (P>0.05). The rate of femoral head osteonecrosis in the orthosis combined with walker group was significantly lower than that in the improved hip frog cast fixation group (1.5% vs. 5.3%,P<0.05), but the re-dislocation rate in the former was significantly higher than that in the latter (6.9% vs. 1.1 %, P<0.05).
CONCLUSION: Both methods are effective for DDH. Orthosis combined with walker has a lower proportion of femoral head osteonecrosis, but a higher proportion of re-dislocation.