Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2010
Unicondylar osteoarticular allograft reconstruction of the distal femur in a patient with a traumatic osteoaticular defect of the lateral femoral condyle.
Клинический случайСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lee Ju Hong, Wang Seong Il, Choi Hee Rack, Hwang Byung Yun, Lim Young Jin, Wie Jin Sang, Huh Soon Ho
Аннотация
PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to report the clinical results for a patient with a post-traumatic osteoarticular defect of the lateral femoral condyle treated with unicondylar osteoarticular allograft reconstruction.
METHOD: We describe the case with a massive osteoarticular loss of the lateral femoral condyle combined with a grade IIIA open distal femoral diaphyesal fracture. The patient underwent unicondylar osteoarticular reconstruction with an allogenic fresh-frozen condyle.
RESULTS: There were no complications after the reconstructive procedure. At the five year follow-up, the patient showed a favorable clinical outcome with a full range of motion of the knee joint. Degenerative changes were seen in the graft compartment, but they did not cause serious functional limitations.
CONCLUSION: Unicondylar allograft reconstruction appears to be a surgical option for patients who suffer from a post-traumatic distal femoral osteoarticular defect in which only one condyle is absent or severely damaged.
METHOD: We describe the case with a massive osteoarticular loss of the lateral femoral condyle combined with a grade IIIA open distal femoral diaphyesal fracture. The patient underwent unicondylar osteoarticular reconstruction with an allogenic fresh-frozen condyle.
RESULTS: There were no complications after the reconstructive procedure. At the five year follow-up, the patient showed a favorable clinical outcome with a full range of motion of the knee joint. Degenerative changes were seen in the graft compartment, but they did not cause serious functional limitations.
CONCLUSION: Unicondylar allograft reconstruction appears to be a surgical option for patients who suffer from a post-traumatic distal femoral osteoarticular defect in which only one condyle is absent or severely damaged.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Accidents, TrafficBone NailsBone TransplantationEpiphysesExternal FixatorsFemoral FracturesFollow-Up StudiesFracture Fixation, InternalFracture HealingHumansInjury Severity ScoreKnee InjuriesMaleMiddle AgedPain MeasurementRadiographyRange of Motion, ArticularPlastic Surgery ProceduresRecovery of FunctionReoperationRisk AssessmentTransplantation, Homologous