BMC health services research · 2026
Physician burnout assessed by the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory - the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic: meta-analysis.
СтатьяМетаанализНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ulbrichtová Romana, Baška Tibor, Tatarková Mária, Malobická Eva, Štekláčová Nika, Kelčíková Simona, Hudečková Henrieta, Švihrová Viera
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The aim of our meta-analysis was to determine the global prevalence of burnout among physicians measured by the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory (CBI).
METHODS: A meta-analysis performed following the PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched for trials on the prevalence of physician's burnout syndrome. A literature search (October-November 2025) was performed, and pooled prevalence was estimated using a random-effects model. Joanna's Briggs Institute (JBI) quality assessment tool was used to evaluate the risk of bias. Cochrane I-squared test was used to evaluate the heterogeneity among studies. The meta-analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics software (version 29.0.2.0.).
RESULTS: Thirty-nine cross-sectional studies containing 17,963 physicians were finally included in the analysis. The global prevalence of burnout was 52% (95% CI: 46%-57%). Pre-pandemic studies from Europe yielded a pooled prevalence of 34% (95% CI: 23%-46%), compared with 47% (95% CI: 34%-61%) during the COVID-19 era. In Asia, the pooled prevalence increased from 55% (95% CI: 46%-64%) before the pandemic to 66% (95% CI: 57%-74%) during the pandemic.
CONCLUSIONS: A large number of physicians were identified as having moderate-high burnout levels. The findings of this analysis highlight the need for policy measures aimed at enhancing the working environment of healthcare professionals and mitigating burnout.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: The protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD420251177705).
CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
METHODS: A meta-analysis performed following the PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched for trials on the prevalence of physician's burnout syndrome. A literature search (October-November 2025) was performed, and pooled prevalence was estimated using a random-effects model. Joanna's Briggs Institute (JBI) quality assessment tool was used to evaluate the risk of bias. Cochrane I-squared test was used to evaluate the heterogeneity among studies. The meta-analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics software (version 29.0.2.0.).
RESULTS: Thirty-nine cross-sectional studies containing 17,963 physicians were finally included in the analysis. The global prevalence of burnout was 52% (95% CI: 46%-57%). Pre-pandemic studies from Europe yielded a pooled prevalence of 34% (95% CI: 23%-46%), compared with 47% (95% CI: 34%-61%) during the COVID-19 era. In Asia, the pooled prevalence increased from 55% (95% CI: 46%-64%) before the pandemic to 66% (95% CI: 57%-74%) during the pandemic.
CONCLUSIONS: A large number of physicians were identified as having moderate-high burnout levels. The findings of this analysis highlight the need for policy measures aimed at enhancing the working environment of healthcare professionals and mitigating burnout.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: The protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD420251177705).
CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.