MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/01.olq.0000223248.96376.3b

Медицинская библиотека · Sexually transmitted diseases · 2007

Surveillance systems for sexually transmitted diseases in Switzerland.

Zwahlen Marcel, Spoerri Adrian, Gebhardt Martin, Mäusezahl Mirjam, Boubaker Karim, Low Nicola

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

In Switzerland (population 7.4 million), 3 different systems contribute to surveillance for sexually transmitted infections.

GOAL: The goal of this study was to compare time trends from surveillance systems for chlamydia, gonorrhea, and syphilis.

STUDY

DESIGN

We studied surveillance data (1997-2003) from laboratory reports in women and men, men attending dermatology clinics, and women attending gynecologists.

RESULTS

Laboratory reports of episodes of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae increased by 31% (from 2573 to 3449 cases) and 104% (from 259 to 528 cases), respectively. Over the same period, chlamydia reports from men attending dermatology clinics and women attending gynecologists did not change and dermatology clinic-based reports of gonorrhea in men increased only slightly. Syphilis reports from dermatology clinics increased by 127% (from 22 to 50 cases).

CONCLUSIONS

Increases in laboratory reports of chlamydia and gonorrhea were not consistently detected in sentinel populations. Numbers of cases reported to all 3 systems were low. The performance of surveillance systems for sexually transmitted infections should be evaluated regularly.

Для цитирования: Zwahlen Marcel, Spoerri Adrian, Gebhardt Martin, Mäusezahl Mirjam, Boubaker Karim, Low Nicola. Surveillance systems for sexually transmitted diseases in Switzerland.. Sexually transmitted diseases. 2007. DOI: 10.1097/01.olq.0000223248.96376.3b.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.