Prenatal diagnosis · 2012
Fetal forearm anomalies: prenatal diagnosis, associations and management strategy.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Pajkrt Eva, Cicero Simona, Griffin David R, van Maarle M C, Chitty Lyn S
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To determine the underlying associations in fetuses with forearm anomalies, and to derive a management strategy to improve prenatal diagnosis and parental counselling.
METHODS: A retrospective review of fetal medicine unit records to identify all cases with an absent, short or abnormal radius and/or ulna. Cases with a generalised skeletal dysplasia were excluded. Fetal medicine, maternal, neonatal and, where appropriate, histopathological reports, were reviewed.
RESULTS: Sixty-six cases were identified. Two were lost to follow-up and subsequently omitted. Chromosomal anomalies accounted for 19 cases (29.7%), genetic syndromes for 19 (29.7%) and isolated forearm defects for 15 cases (23%). A definitive postnatal diagnosis was made in 54 cases (84%). In 45 of the 64 (70%) cases, a correct prenatal diagnosis was made. Cases with bilateral lesions had a significantly higher association with aneuploidy and genetic syndromes, while those with a sonographically isolated unilateral forearm defect had a very low incidence of other underlying pathology.
CONCLUSION: Fetuses with bilateral forearm defects or those with unilateral lesions and other abnormalities detected prenatally have a high incidence of aneuploidy and genetic syndromes. Isolated, unilateral lesions usually have a good prognosis. A management strategy is presented to aid accurate prenatal diagnosis and parental counselling.
METHODS: A retrospective review of fetal medicine unit records to identify all cases with an absent, short or abnormal radius and/or ulna. Cases with a generalised skeletal dysplasia were excluded. Fetal medicine, maternal, neonatal and, where appropriate, histopathological reports, were reviewed.
RESULTS: Sixty-six cases were identified. Two were lost to follow-up and subsequently omitted. Chromosomal anomalies accounted for 19 cases (29.7%), genetic syndromes for 19 (29.7%) and isolated forearm defects for 15 cases (23%). A definitive postnatal diagnosis was made in 54 cases (84%). In 45 of the 64 (70%) cases, a correct prenatal diagnosis was made. Cases with bilateral lesions had a significantly higher association with aneuploidy and genetic syndromes, while those with a sonographically isolated unilateral forearm defect had a very low incidence of other underlying pathology.
CONCLUSION: Fetuses with bilateral forearm defects or those with unilateral lesions and other abnormalities detected prenatally have a high incidence of aneuploidy and genetic syndromes. Isolated, unilateral lesions usually have a good prognosis. A management strategy is presented to aid accurate prenatal diagnosis and parental counselling.