Jornal brasileiro de nefrologia · 2026
Improvement in kidney function in patients with chronic hepatitis B and chronic kidney disease after switching to tenofovir alafenamide fumarate: a systematic review with single arm meta-analysis.
СтатьяСистематический обзорМетаанализНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Pascoa Junior João Galdino de, Huntermann Ramon, Gomes Victor Machado Viana, Mendes Filho Frederico de Sousa Marinho, Bertozzi João Marcelo Vallim, Lins Paulo Ricardo Gessolo
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) is effective in treating hepatitis B virus, (HBV) but has been associated with nephrotoxicity. In contrast, tenofovir alafenamide fumarate (TAF) has emerged as a safer alternative, reducing kidney exposure while maintaining antiviral efficacy. This meta-analysis evaluates improvements in kidney function following the switch from TDF to TAF.
METHODS: Our study was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024565358) and included 10 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 1,179 patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). We compared renal function before and after switching to TAF.
RESULTS: Significant improvements in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) were observed, indicating enhanced kidney function post-switch. The findings confirm that TAF has a superior renal safety profile compared to TDF, particularly in long-term treatments.
CONCLUSION: The clinical relevance of TAF for HBV patients with CKD aligns with current guideline shifts favoring TAF. Despite limitations such as high heterogeneity, this study supports TAF as a safer management strategy for HBV patients with CKD, demonstrating improved kidney outcomes and reduced nephrotoxicity risks. These findings support its broader use in clinical practice and highlight the need for further research on long-term renal outcomes.
METHODS: Our study was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024565358) and included 10 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 1,179 patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). We compared renal function before and after switching to TAF.
RESULTS: Significant improvements in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) were observed, indicating enhanced kidney function post-switch. The findings confirm that TAF has a superior renal safety profile compared to TDF, particularly in long-term treatments.
CONCLUSION: The clinical relevance of TAF for HBV patients with CKD aligns with current guideline shifts favoring TAF. Despite limitations such as high heterogeneity, this study supports TAF as a safer management strategy for HBV patients with CKD, demonstrating improved kidney outcomes and reduced nephrotoxicity risks. These findings support its broader use in clinical practice and highlight the need for further research on long-term renal outcomes.