European journal of anaesthesiology · 2015
General anaesthetic agents do not influence persistent pain after breast cancer surgery: A prospective nationwide cohort study.
СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lefebvre-Kuntz Danièle, Dualé Christian, Albi-Feldzer Aline, Nougarède Bertrand, Falewee Marie-Noëlle, Ouchchane Lemlih, Soule-Sonneville Sylvie, Bonneau Julie, Dubray Claude, Schoeffler Pierre
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: It has recently been suggested that propofol exerts a protective effect on the occurrence of persistent pain after breast cancer surgery. We analysed data from a subcohort taken from a multicentre study to validate this information.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this article is to study the role of the agent used for maintenance of general anaesthesia on the occurrence of persistent pain, with adjustment for multiple pre and peri-operative variables using the generalised linear model.
DESIGN: A prospective cohort study.
SETTING: Four French university hospitals.
PATIENTS: Three hundred and twenty-eight and 362 patients with full dataset, depending on the studied outcome.
INTERVENTION: Questionnaires sent at the third and the sixth month after surgery.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The risk of persistent postsurgical neuropathic pain (defined by the DN4 questionnaire) within 6 months after surgery, and the intensity of persistent pain at the sixth month.
RESULTS: Axillary lymph node harvesting and previous history of peripheral neuropathy were independent risk factors of persistent postsurgical neuropathic pain, although older age was protective. The same independent risk factors, but not age, explained the intensity of persistent postsurgical pain at the sixth month after surgery. We did not find any effect of the general anaesthetic, whether halogenated agent or propofol, using either unadjusted or adjusted analyses based on covariates or propensity score.
CONCLUSION: There does not appear to be a role for the anaesthetic protocol in the occurrence of persistent postsurgical pain. Other already well established hypotheses were confirmed.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (ref. NCT00812734).
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this article is to study the role of the agent used for maintenance of general anaesthesia on the occurrence of persistent pain, with adjustment for multiple pre and peri-operative variables using the generalised linear model.
DESIGN: A prospective cohort study.
SETTING: Four French university hospitals.
PATIENTS: Three hundred and twenty-eight and 362 patients with full dataset, depending on the studied outcome.
INTERVENTION: Questionnaires sent at the third and the sixth month after surgery.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The risk of persistent postsurgical neuropathic pain (defined by the DN4 questionnaire) within 6 months after surgery, and the intensity of persistent pain at the sixth month.
RESULTS: Axillary lymph node harvesting and previous history of peripheral neuropathy were independent risk factors of persistent postsurgical neuropathic pain, although older age was protective. The same independent risk factors, but not age, explained the intensity of persistent postsurgical pain at the sixth month after surgery. We did not find any effect of the general anaesthetic, whether halogenated agent or propofol, using either unadjusted or adjusted analyses based on covariates or propensity score.
CONCLUSION: There does not appear to be a role for the anaesthetic protocol in the occurrence of persistent postsurgical pain. Other already well established hypotheses were confirmed.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (ref. NCT00812734).