Experiences of persons with lower limb amputation after prosthetic rehabilitation in Ghana: A qualitative inquiry.

BACKGROUND

Lower limb amputations (LLAs) have long been associated with physical, social, and psychological consequences. Individuals with LLAs have challenges with mobility and often become isolated from their social networks. Disability rehabilitation technologies such as prosthetic devices are used to improve the mobility capabilities of lower limb amputees. To improve clinical outcomes, feedback from the prosthetic users is a key element to consider.

OBJECTIVES

The study sort to explore the experiences of lower-limb prosthetic users after prosthetic rehabilitation in a prosthetic and orthotic rehabilitation center in the Eastern Region of Ghana.

STUDY

DESIGN

This study adopted an exploratory descriptive qualitative study design.

METHODS

A purposive sampling technique and semistructured interview guide was used to interview 17 participants by the first author. The social model of disability underpinned the study. Lower-limb prosthetic users (≥18 years) with unilateral LLA attending outpatient follow-up at a prosthetic and orthotic rehabilitation center were recruited. The interviews were audio recoded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using the procedure for thematic content analysis by Braun and Clarke (2013).

RESULTS

Participants reported injuries and tingling in their residual limb. Internal stigma resulting from negative comments and labeling from the public were reported. Prosthetic users experienced empathy and being treated as weaklings by their family/peers. Participants avoided relationships because of recurrent rejection, embarrassment, fear of sexual abuse, and exploitation. As a coping method, some participants chose to isolate themselves to avoid humiliation and public disgrace. Other coping mechanisms included watching television, listening to music, conversing with others, ignoring criticism, and having faith in God.

CONCLUSION

Participants' narrative in this study gave insight into the varied lived experiences on the individual level, family/peer level, and the coping mechanisms used. Challenges relating to discomfort from the prosthesis, internal stigma, relationship avoidance, and altered sexual life should be given much attention and used in implementing initiatives to improve clinical outcomes.