MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.25259/sni_742_2023

Медицинская библиотека · Surgical neurology international · 2023

Late intrathecal retraction of a lumboperitoneal shunt.

Kim Young Ju, Fujita Atsushi, Maeyama Masahiro, Hori Tatsuo, Tanaka Kazuhiro, Sasayama Takashi

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Lumboperitoneal (LP) shunt placement is a good option for treating elderly patients with communicating normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH) who are also on antiplatelet therapy following endovascular treatment of unruptured bilateral internal carotid artery aneurysms. Here, in an 80-year-old male with an LP shunt, the catheter was "pinched" between adjacent spinous processes, resulting in laceration of the catheter and intrathecal catheter migration.

CASE DESCRIPTION: An 80-year-old male was treated with a LP shunt for NPH 1 year after undergoing endovascular treatment of unruptured bilateral internal carotid artery aneurysms. The lumbar catheter was placed at the L2-3 level. Six months later, when he clinically deteriorated, the follow-up computed tomography showed recurrent ventricular enlargement. Further, studies additionally confirmed intrathecal migration of the lumbar catheter, warranting secondary ventriculoperitoneal shunt placement.

CONCLUSION

Patients with LP shunts may develop lumbar catheter lacerations secondary to a "pinching" effect from adjacent spinous processes, resulting in intrathecal catheter migration.

Для цитирования: Kim Young Ju, Fujita Atsushi, Maeyama Masahiro, Hori Tatsuo, Tanaka Kazuhiro, Sasayama Takashi. Late intrathecal retraction of a lumboperitoneal shunt.. Surgical neurology international. 2023. DOI: 10.25259/sni_742_2023.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.