The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association · 2023
Impact of Prenatal Care on Newborn Complications for Infants with Cleft Lip with or Without Cleft Palate.
СтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Loomis-Goltl Evy, Briley Patrick, Kotlarek Katelyn J
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To determine the association between prenatal care and cleft lip with or without cleft palate (CL ± P) and examine differences in newborn complications among infants diagnosed with CL ± P as a function of prenatal care.
DESIGN: Population-based retrospective cohort study.
SETTING: 2018 United States National Vital Statistics System-Natality component (NVSS-N) was used to examine nationwide birth certificate data.
PARTICIPANTS: 3,414,338 infants from the 2018 National Vital Statistics System, of which 1,699 had CL ± P.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Diagnosis of CL ± P and presence of newborn complications as a function of prenatal care.
RESULTS: Significant differences were found among various infant- and mother-specific variables when baseline comparisons were made between infants with and without CL ± P. After controlling for baseline differences, results indicated decreased odds of a diagnosis of CL ± P in cases where overall adequate prenatal care was obtained (OR = .841; 95% CI .757, .934), including prenatal care beginning in the 1st trimester (OR = .839; 95% CI .750, .939) and an adequate number of prenatal visits received (OR = .864; 95% CI .764, .976). Of infants with CL ± P, reduced odds of the infant admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit (OR = .777; 95% CI .613, .985) or transferred (OR = .601; 95% CI .407, .888) were apparent when adequate prenatal care was received.
CONCLUSION: Results suggest adequate prenatal care not only reduces the likelihood of CL ± P in infants but may also decrease the severity of negative outcomes in infants diagnosed with CL ± P. These findings emphasize necessity for adequate prenatal care.
DESIGN: Population-based retrospective cohort study.
SETTING: 2018 United States National Vital Statistics System-Natality component (NVSS-N) was used to examine nationwide birth certificate data.
PARTICIPANTS: 3,414,338 infants from the 2018 National Vital Statistics System, of which 1,699 had CL ± P.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Diagnosis of CL ± P and presence of newborn complications as a function of prenatal care.
RESULTS: Significant differences were found among various infant- and mother-specific variables when baseline comparisons were made between infants with and without CL ± P. After controlling for baseline differences, results indicated decreased odds of a diagnosis of CL ± P in cases where overall adequate prenatal care was obtained (OR = .841; 95% CI .757, .934), including prenatal care beginning in the 1st trimester (OR = .839; 95% CI .750, .939) and an adequate number of prenatal visits received (OR = .864; 95% CI .764, .976). Of infants with CL ± P, reduced odds of the infant admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit (OR = .777; 95% CI .613, .985) or transferred (OR = .601; 95% CI .407, .888) were apparent when adequate prenatal care was received.
CONCLUSION: Results suggest adequate prenatal care not only reduces the likelihood of CL ± P in infants but may also decrease the severity of negative outcomes in infants diagnosed with CL ± P. These findings emphasize necessity for adequate prenatal care.