MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3233/nre-151220

Медицинская библиотека · NeuroRehabilitation · 2015

Bilateral ptosis: Lesion in the oculomotor nuclei or supranuclear lesion?

Dimitriou Julien, Montoute Timothy, Levivier Marc, Borruat François-Xavier, Diserens Karin

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Bilateral ptosis is a very interesting clinical challenge for doctors because of the multiple possible localizations of a lesion which can lead to this neurological sign.

OBJECTIVES

Through this case report, we aim to determine the difference between an apraxia of lid opening (ALO) with difficulty in initiating the act of lid elevation, in spite of adequate understanding, motor control and cranial nerve pathways, and a bilateral ptosis with a lesion in the oculomotor nucleus or blepharospasm.

METHODS

The case report of a 50-year-old patient presenting bilateral ptosis and multiple ischemic lesions in the brainstem and bilateral frontal lobe lesions after the emergency removal of a large frontal tumor.

RESULTS

Our patient had an ALO according to the neurological follow-up and showed the ability, after a few weeks, of initiating the act of opening her eyes with her hand. The ophthalmic evaluation confirmed that in her case the ALO was associated with a nuclear lesion of the oculomotor nerve secondary to a midbrain lesion.

CONCLUSION

Our case report confirms multiple differential diagnoses in bilateral ptosis and the importance of clinical examination in spite of good neurological imaging.

Для цитирования: Dimitriou Julien, Montoute Timothy, Levivier Marc, Borruat François-Xavier, Diserens Karin. Bilateral ptosis: Lesion in the oculomotor nuclei or supranuclear lesion?. NeuroRehabilitation. 2015. DOI: 10.3233/nre-151220.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.