[Sacral neuromodulation is effective in the treatment of fecal incontinence with intact sphincter muscles; a prospective study].
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the therapeutic effect of sacral neuromodulation on faecal incontinence in patients with structurally intact sphincters.
DESIGN
Prospective.
METHOD: In the period April 1st, 2000 to November 30th, 2001, patients with faecal incontinence and structurally intact sphincters were included, with or without previous surgery, in whom medicinal treatment and biofeedback therapy gave no improvement. Incontinence was defined as involuntary loss of stool at least once a week, which was objectified by completion of a 3-week bowel habit diary. Patients underwent 3 weeks of trial stimulation during which they also kept a diary. The trial stimulation was considered successful if the diary showed a > or = 50% improvement in continence.
RESULTS
38 patients (31 women) with an average age of 54 years (range: 26-73) underwent trial stimulation. Trail stimulation was carried out using a permanent electrode in 6 patients and using peripheral neural evaluation in the remaining 32 patients. Two patients did not respond to peripheral neural evaluation. Upon assessment after the trial stimulation period. continence was found to have improved by > or = 50% in 31 (82%) patients. The number of incontinence episodes decreased by an average of 86% (range: 50-100). In 27 patients an implantable pulse generator was implanted for continuous stimulation. During the average follow-up of 6 months the effect remained satisfactory. Anal manometry during stimulation showed no increase of sphincter pressures.
CONCLUSION
Sacral neuromodulation was of therapeutic value in most of the patients treated for faecal incontinence without sphincter damage.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.