MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/00007435-200406000-00003

Медицинская библиотека · Sexually transmitted diseases · 2004

Clients of female sex workers in Lima, Peru: a bridge population for sexually transmitted disease/HIV transmission?

Miller Gregg A, Mendoza Walter, Krone Melissa R, Meza Rena, Caceres Carlos F, Coates Thomas J, Klausner Jeffrey D

СтатьяПоддержка службы здравоохранения СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

The objectives of this study were to determine the prevalence of risk behaviors, gonorrhea, and chlamydia in clients of female sex workers, and to compare them with men selected from the general population.

STUDY

DESIGN

We conducted a cross-sectional study of men recruited from commercial sex venues in Lima, Peru from January to February 2002. Subjects answered a survey and provided a urine sample.

RESULTS

Men reported that in the recently concluded commercial sex encounter, 95.8% used condoms, and 85.8% always used condoms with female sex workers. Only 16% reported always using condoms with their stable partners; 50.8% always used condoms with casual, noncommercial partners; and 59.6% always used condoms for homosexual anal sex. There were 8 (2%) cases of chlamydia and no cases of gonorrhea.

CONCLUSIONS

Clients of female sex workers report high rates of condom use with sex workers and a low prevalence of chlamydia and gonorrhea. It is unlikely that they constitute a bridging population.

Для цитирования: Miller Gregg A, Mendoza Walter, Krone Melissa R, Meza Rena, Caceres Carlos F, Coates Thomas J, Klausner Jeffrey D. Clients of female sex workers in Lima, Peru: a bridge population for sexually transmitted disease/HIV transmission?. Sexually transmitted diseases. 2004. DOI: 10.1097/00007435-200406000-00003.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.