Journal of science and medicine in sport · 2019
Exercise-based injury prevention for community-level adolescent cricket pace bowlers: A cluster-randomised controlled trial.
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Forrest Mitchell R L, Hebert Jeffrey J, Scott Brendan R, Dempsey Alasdair R
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: To investigate if an exercise-based injury prevention program (IPP) can modify risk factors for injury in community-level adolescent cricket pace bowlers.
DESIGN: Cluster-randomised controlled trial.
METHODS: Eight cricket organisations (training two times per week and no previous involvement in a structured IPP) participated in this cluster-randomised trial. Participants were aged 14-17 years, injury free, and not currently performing a rehabilitation/exercise program. Cricket organisations (clusters) were block-randomised by computerised number generation into an intervention group (performed an eight-week IPP at training) or control group (continued their usual cricket activity). Participants were not blinded to group allocation. Strength, endurance, and neuromuscular control were assessed at baseline and follow-up. Treatment effects were estimated using linear mixed models.
RESULTS: Sixty-five male adolescent pace bowlers (intervention n=32 and control n=33) were randomised. There were significant treatment effects favouring the intervention group for shoulder strength (90°/s) 0.05 (95% CI 0.02-0.09) Nm/kg, hamstring strength (60°/s) 0.32 (95% CI 0.13-0.50) Nm/kg, hip adductor strength dominant 0.40 (95% CI 0.26-0.55) Nm/kg and non-dominant 0.33 (95% CI 0.20-0.47) Nm/kg, SEBT reach distance dominant 3.80 (95% CI 1.63-6.04) percent of leg length (%LL) and non-dominant 3.60 (95% CI 1.43-5.78) %LL, and back endurance 20.4 (95% CI 4.80-36.0) seconds. No differences were observed for shoulder strength (180°/s) (p=0.09), hamstring strength (180°/s) (p=0.07), lumbopelvic stability (p=0.90), and single leg squat knee valgus angle (dominant p=0.06, non-dominant p=0.15).
CONCLUSIONS: Exercise-based IPPs can modify risk factors for injury in community-level adolescent pace bowlers. Future research is needed to confirm if IPPs can also reduce injury risk in this population.
DESIGN: Cluster-randomised controlled trial.
METHODS: Eight cricket organisations (training two times per week and no previous involvement in a structured IPP) participated in this cluster-randomised trial. Participants were aged 14-17 years, injury free, and not currently performing a rehabilitation/exercise program. Cricket organisations (clusters) were block-randomised by computerised number generation into an intervention group (performed an eight-week IPP at training) or control group (continued their usual cricket activity). Participants were not blinded to group allocation. Strength, endurance, and neuromuscular control were assessed at baseline and follow-up. Treatment effects were estimated using linear mixed models.
RESULTS: Sixty-five male adolescent pace bowlers (intervention n=32 and control n=33) were randomised. There were significant treatment effects favouring the intervention group for shoulder strength (90°/s) 0.05 (95% CI 0.02-0.09) Nm/kg, hamstring strength (60°/s) 0.32 (95% CI 0.13-0.50) Nm/kg, hip adductor strength dominant 0.40 (95% CI 0.26-0.55) Nm/kg and non-dominant 0.33 (95% CI 0.20-0.47) Nm/kg, SEBT reach distance dominant 3.80 (95% CI 1.63-6.04) percent of leg length (%LL) and non-dominant 3.60 (95% CI 1.43-5.78) %LL, and back endurance 20.4 (95% CI 4.80-36.0) seconds. No differences were observed for shoulder strength (180°/s) (p=0.09), hamstring strength (180°/s) (p=0.07), lumbopelvic stability (p=0.90), and single leg squat knee valgus angle (dominant p=0.06, non-dominant p=0.15).
CONCLUSIONS: Exercise-based IPPs can modify risk factors for injury in community-level adolescent pace bowlers. Future research is needed to confirm if IPPs can also reduce injury risk in this population.