Human reproduction (Oxford, England) · 1993
Comparison of two local anaesthetics in transvaginal ultrasound-guided oocyte retrieval.
Клиническое исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Godoy H, Erard P, De Munck L, Camus M, Gepts E, Van Steirteghem A C, Devroey P
Аннотация
Transvaginal ultrasound-guided oocyte retrieval is an accepted procedure in most in-vitro fertilization programmes. In order to simplify the anaesthetic procedure into a minimally invasive one, we perform the oocyte retrieval under a modified para-cervical block combined with a standard pre-medication. In order to maximize the patient's comfort we evaluated two different local anaesthetics and their side-effects. Patients were allocated at random to receive a modified para-cervical block with mepivacaine 1% (n = 46) or with prilocaine 1% (n = 54). The patients were asked to fill in a visual analogue scale (VAS) including assessment of anxiety, pain and comfort concerning the procedure. The two local anaesthetics were both effective in reducing pain during transvaginal oocyte retrieval. The mean VAS scores were acceptable and were efficient as indicators of patient's comfort during the procedure. Mepivacaine was selected for routine use since prilocaine induced methaemoglobinaemia.