Pregnancy hypertension · 2025
Meta-analysis evaluating the risks and outcomes of pulmonary hypertension in pregnant women.
СтатьяМетаанализСистематический обзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Li Yangting, Yang Xiaolei, Zeng Maoni, Luo Tao, Lian Xiaoyuan, Liu Jiali, Liu Qiaolin, Xiao Fei
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: Pulmonary hypertension (PH) in pregnancy has traditionally been linked to a higher likelihood of negative outcomes for both the mother and the fetus. A systematic analysis of published papers in recent decades regarding outcomes of pregnancy in patients with PH.
METHODS: To comprehensively investigate the dangers and final results associated with PH in pregnant women, this study conducted an extensive search across multiple databases. It mainly includes authoritative databases both domestically and internationally, such as PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, etc. Two authors screened the retrieved articles independently using predefined screening criteria, and assessed the quality of the included studies using the "RevMan5.3 Risk of Bias Assessment Tool".
RESULTS: By searching EMBASE, a total of 10 studies were deemed appropriate and brought into the subsequent meta-analysis. Among all the included studies, 10 trials reported the incidence of adverse pregnancy outcomes. The homogeneity test (P < 0.01, I2 = 64 %) showed the existence of heterogeneity, and a random effects model was employed for the analysis. The results of the meta-analysis indicate a significant difference in the incidence of adverse pregnancy outcomes between pregnant women with mild to moderate PH and those with severe PH (RR = 0.67, 95 % CI 0.60 ∼ 0.75, P < 0.01). Among the included studies, 5 trials reported the incidence of adverse pregnancy outcomes. The homogeneity test (P = 0.05, I2 = 58 %) showed the existence of heterogeneity, and a random effects model was employed for statistical analysis. The meta-analysis results revealed a significant difference in the proportion of patients with mild to moderate pulmonary arterial hypertension compared to pregnant women with severe disease in cardiac function grades III to IV (RR = 0.48, 95 % CI 0.39 ∼ 0.58, P < 0.01). Using region and sample size as subgroup classifications, large samples (n > 100, n > 70) and small sample (n ≤ 100, n ≤ 70), the heterogeneity of non-China patients was lower (I2 = 0 %); meanwhile, the heterogeneity of n > 100, n > 70 was higher than that of studies with n 100 and n 70, indicating that the heterogeneity decreased with the decrease in sample size.
CONCLUSIONS: After conducting a meta-analysis, it was found that the severity of pH is closely associated with maternal and fetal outcomes. In the subsequent analysis, we will further explore the impact of different treatments and nursing methods on maternal and infant results in patients who have PH.
METHODS: To comprehensively investigate the dangers and final results associated with PH in pregnant women, this study conducted an extensive search across multiple databases. It mainly includes authoritative databases both domestically and internationally, such as PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, etc. Two authors screened the retrieved articles independently using predefined screening criteria, and assessed the quality of the included studies using the "RevMan5.3 Risk of Bias Assessment Tool".
RESULTS: By searching EMBASE, a total of 10 studies were deemed appropriate and brought into the subsequent meta-analysis. Among all the included studies, 10 trials reported the incidence of adverse pregnancy outcomes. The homogeneity test (P < 0.01, I2 = 64 %) showed the existence of heterogeneity, and a random effects model was employed for the analysis. The results of the meta-analysis indicate a significant difference in the incidence of adverse pregnancy outcomes between pregnant women with mild to moderate PH and those with severe PH (RR = 0.67, 95 % CI 0.60 ∼ 0.75, P < 0.01). Among the included studies, 5 trials reported the incidence of adverse pregnancy outcomes. The homogeneity test (P = 0.05, I2 = 58 %) showed the existence of heterogeneity, and a random effects model was employed for statistical analysis. The meta-analysis results revealed a significant difference in the proportion of patients with mild to moderate pulmonary arterial hypertension compared to pregnant women with severe disease in cardiac function grades III to IV (RR = 0.48, 95 % CI 0.39 ∼ 0.58, P < 0.01). Using region and sample size as subgroup classifications, large samples (n > 100, n > 70) and small sample (n ≤ 100, n ≤ 70), the heterogeneity of non-China patients was lower (I2 = 0 %); meanwhile, the heterogeneity of n > 100, n > 70 was higher than that of studies with n 100 and n 70, indicating that the heterogeneity decreased with the decrease in sample size.
CONCLUSIONS: After conducting a meta-analysis, it was found that the severity of pH is closely associated with maternal and fetal outcomes. In the subsequent analysis, we will further explore the impact of different treatments and nursing methods on maternal and infant results in patients who have PH.