MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1001/jamadermatol.2020.0796

Медицинская библиотека · JAMA dermatology · 2020

Systemic Immunomodulatory Treatments for Patients With Atopic Dermatitis: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.

Drucker Aaron M, Ellis Alexandra G, Bohdanowicz Michal, Mashayekhi Soudeh, Yiu Zenas Z N, Rochwerg Bram, Di Giorgio Sonya, Arents Bernd W M, Burton Tim, Spuls Phyllis I, Küster Denise, Siegels Doreen, Schmitt Jochen, Flohr Carsten

СтатьяNetwork Meta-AnalysisПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАСистематический обзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

IMPORTANCE

Most clinical trials assessing systemic immunomodulatory treatments for patients with atopic dermatitis are placebo-controlled.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effectiveness and safety of systemic immunomodulatory treatments for patients with atopic dermatitis in a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

DATA SOURCES: The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, Embase, Latin American and Caribbean Health Science Information database, Global Resource of Eczema Trials database, and clinical trial registries were searched from inception to October 28, 2019.

STUDY SELECTION: English-language randomized clinical trials of 8 weeks or more of treatment with systemic immunomodulatory medications for moderate to severe atopic dermatitis were included. Titles, abstracts, and articles were screened in duplicate. Of 10 324 citations, 39 trials were included.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Data were extracted in duplicate, and the review adhered to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses for Network Meta-Analyses guidelines. Random-effects bayesian network meta-analyses were performed and certainty of evidence was assessed using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation criteria.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Prespecified outcomes were change in signs of disease, symptoms, quality of life, itch, withdrawals, and serious adverse events.

RESULTS

A total of 39 trials with 6360 patients examining 20 medications and placebo were included. Most trials were conducted for adults receiving up to 16 weeks of therapy. Dupilumab, 300 mg every 2 weeks, was associated with improvement in the Eczema Area and Severity Index score vs placebo (mean difference, 11.3-point reduction; 95% credible interval [CrI], 9.7-13.1 [high certainty]). Cyclosporine (standardized mean difference, -1.1; 95% CrI, -1.7 to -0.5 [low certainty]) and dupilumab (standardized mean difference, -0.9; 95% CrI, -1.0 to -0.8 [high certainty]) were similarly effective vs placebo in clearing clinical signs of atopic dermatitis and may be superior to methotrexate (standardized mean difference, -0.6; 95% CrI, -1.1 to 0.0 [low certainty]) and azathioprine (standardized mean difference, -0.4; 95% CrI, -0.8 to -0.1 [low certainty]). Several investigational medications for atopic dermatitis are promising, but data to date are limited to small early-phase trials. Safety analyses were limited by low event rates.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Dupilumab and cyclosporine may be more effective for up to 16 weeks of treatment than methotrexate and azathioprine for treating adult patients with atopic dermatitis. More studies directly comparing established and novel treatments beyond 16 weeks are needed and will be incorporated into future updates of this review.

Для цитирования: Drucker Aaron M, Ellis Alexandra G, Bohdanowicz Michal, Mashayekhi Soudeh, Yiu Zenas Z N, Rochwerg Bram, Di Giorgio Sonya, Arents Bernd W M, Burton Tim, Spuls Phyllis I, Küster Denise, Siegels Doreen, Schmitt Jochen, Flohr Carsten. Systemic Immunomodulatory Treatments for Patients With Atopic Dermatitis: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.. JAMA dermatology. 2020. DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2020.0796.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.