MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1309/kqld-7jae-1b40-1cun

Медицинская библиотека · American journal of clinical pathology · 2003

Evaluation of urine specimen integrity in a public health STD screening program.

Birch Nathan C, Stickle Douglas F, Young Anita, Medina Philip, Hinrichs Steven H

Оценочное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and/or Neisseria gonorrhoeae infection in urine using molecular amplification assays has permitted institutions with limited medical facilities to offer testing for these sexually transmitted diseases (STDs). The Nebraska Public Health Laboratory (NPHL) investigated the validity of urine samples submitted for C trachomatis and/or N gonorrhoeae amplification after receiving a substantial number of clear specimens. Approximately 75% of all urine specimens submitted for STD testing to the NPHL were from correctional facilities. The falsification of urine specimens submitted for microbiology studies is not evaluated routinely, and this problem was previously undocumented. By using the criteria for specific gravity of 1.001 or less and a creatinine concentration of less than 5 mg/dL (442 mumol/L), approximately 8% of all specimens submitted during the study interval were determined to be inconsistent with urine. The microbiology laboratory should be aware of the possibility for specimen manipulation to identify facilities submitting falsified specimens, to initiate appropriate intervention, and to minimize false-negative reporting.

Для цитирования: Birch Nathan C, Stickle Douglas F, Young Anita, Medina Philip, Hinrichs Steven H. Evaluation of urine specimen integrity in a public health STD screening program.. American journal of clinical pathology. 2003. DOI: 10.1309/kqld-7jae-1b40-1cun.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.